ArticlePloS one2025
The Sharklogger Network-monitoring Cayman Islands shark populations through an innovative citizen science program.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of citizen science can be a cost-effective tool in conservation science but mostly relies on the collation of incidental sighting reports. This study describes the design, operation, and findings of a novel, closely-guided citizen science program (the 'Sharklogger Network') in the Cayman Islands. Participants from the recreational SCUBA diving community used a standardized, effort-based protocol to monitor local coastal shark populations. Over two years (2017-2018) a total of 69 participants conducted 24,442 dives across 472 dives sites and recorded 4,666 shark sightings from eight shark species, of which Caribbean reef shark, nurse shark, and hammerhead spp. were the most frequently observed and encountered throughout the year. The data from dive logs provided evidence for species-specific distribution and abundance patterns across and within islands, indicating a greater abundance of sharks in areas with less anthropogenic activity and with a greater exposure to strong currents, regardless of whether the area was an MPA or not. While both Caribbean reef sharks and nurse sharks showed species-specific depth and habitat preferences, the recording of recognizable individuals showed that some individuals of both species have relatively small home ranges and high site-fidelity to specific areas. The study also provided the first confirmation of reproductive behaviour in both Caribbean reef and nurse sharks taking place in summer (May-August). Experience showed that along with generating valuable data the program, by engaging local stakeholders, also enhanced public awareness of shark conservation issues. This study demonstrates that this citizen science methodology can be an affordable and non-invasive tool for the reliable long-term monitoring of shark populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.