ArticlePloS one2025
Vegetation extraction through UAV RGB imagery and efficient feature selection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated diagnostics and time series sensitivity assessment for growth monitoring of a medicinal plant (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate identification of vegetation in mining areas is crucial for conducting pre-mining ecological assessments and post-mining ecological monitoring. However, the vegetation in the mining area is always highly heterogeneous including both field crops and naturally scattered growing vegetation, which brings great challenges for fine vegetation mapping. Feature combinations are an important factor to influence the vegetation mapping. Thus, to effectively identify the vegetation, this study utilized an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) RGB image to extract vegetation indexes and textures, and then selected features based on standard deviation and difference coefficient. By integrating selected optimal features with RGB images, different combinations were constructed and classified using Support Vector Machine (SVM). The results demonstrated that the combination of RGB and all selected features yielded the highest accuracy, followed by the combination of RGB and a single type of texture, and then the combination of RGB and VIs, which indicated that texture features were more important than VIs for vegetation identification. The OA and Kappa for the best combination were 87.76% and 0.8351 for study area A, and 88.74% and 0.8505 for study area B, indicating the effectiveness of the adopted method. Besides, compared with the commonly used random forest (RF) feature selection method, the adopted method avoided complex parameter settings and constructed a superior optimal combination, which further proved the simplicity and effectiveness of difference coefficient-based feature selection methods for vegetation classification in highly heterogeneous environments, contributing to more accurate ecological assessments and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.