ArticlePloS one2025
Electric trains for reduction of fuel consumption and emissions from the freight transport in Jordan.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transport modes (trucks and diesel trains) used to move phosphate on the corridor connecting Shidiya mine and Aqaba port in Jordan are causing pollutant emissions exceeding global average values. The study proposed the use of electric trains and compared their fuel consumption (FC) and emissions to those of existing transport modes in an attempt to regulate FC and reduce emissions from freight in Jordan. For a more comprehensive view of the three transport modes, FC and emissions were evaluated in various operating conditions in relation to varying speeds, loads, road gradients, and curvatures. Results showed that the three vehicle types were greatly impacted by increasing payloads and speeds. On the other hand, diesel trains were less affected by the road's curvature and more by its gradient. Electric trains can significantly reduce FC and CO2 emissions at 100% payload and an average speed of 60 km/h compared to trucks and diesel trains. Also, the use of electric trains would maintain CO and N2O emissions at acceptable levels. Regression analysis demonstrated significant negative correlations (R2 > 0.9) between FC and pollutant emissions with increasing payloads for the three vehicles. However, positive correlations were obtained with increasing speeds for diesel (R2 = 0.91) and electric trains (R2 = 0.77). The study offers insights into Jordan's future strategies for reducing pollution in the transport sector. Based on the findings of the study, drivers may preferably use 100% payload and maintain an average speed of 60 km/h on the selected corridor. Besides, the use of renewable energy sources could potentially further reduce carbon emissions from electric rails.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.