Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40344034›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Evaluating the support and associated strain distribution in unilateral obturator with different designs: An experimental and finite element study.

Mohammed Mousa, Adam Husein, Mohamed El-Anwar, Norwahida Yusoff, Hussein Alhelay, Badi Alazhari, Fadhel Alsharari, Bader Alzarea, Mohammed Sghaireen, Johari Yap Abdullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohammed MousaProsthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudia Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6268-6824
Adam HuseinSchool of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Mohamed El-AnwarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Centre, Giza, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9840-0579
Norwahida YusoffSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0454-0963
Hussein AlhelayMahayel Specialist Dental Center, Aseer Health Cluster, Asser, Saudi Arabia.
Badi AlazhariProsthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudia Arabia.
Fadhel AlsharariProsthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudia Arabia.ORCID 0009-0004-4467-2631
Bader AlzareaProsthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudia Arabia.
Mohammed SghaireenProsthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudia Arabia.
Johari Yap AbdullahSchool of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6147-4192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate support (the resistance to tissue-ward movement) and strain distribution in unilateral obturators with four designs using Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Twelve epoxy-resin models were prepared to receive removable obturators that have four designs, including acrylic resin-based obturators (ARO), linear (LDO), tripodal (TDO), and a newly modified one termed fully tripodal design obturator (FTDO) were used for DIC. The models were installed in a DIC set to receive a vertical load of 150N. The strain on the dentate and defect sides was evaluated using DIC software. Mathematically, four finite element models were prepared to receive vertical and lateral loads of 100N on two points. The support and strain were assessed using the ANSYS workbench. Using DIC, the ARO demonstrated the highest strain values on the defect area and as an entire prosthesis, followed by the LDO on the defect side. Using FEA, the TDO produced the highest strain value with anterior (oblique) and posterior loads. LDO produced the lowest support and highest strain on the anterior teeth compared to TDO and FTDO. ARO resulted in the highest total strain, while the TDO produced the lowest. Both TDO and FTDO were comparable in terms of strains and support.

Indexed as

Dental Prosthesis DesignFinite Element AnalysisPalatal ObturatorsHumansStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID40344034
PMCPMC12063806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.