Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40344028›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Harmonizing CT scanner acquisition variability in an anthropomorphic phantom: A comparative study of image-level and feature-level harmonization using GAN, ComBat, and their combination.

Shruti Atul Mali, Nastaran Mohammadian Rad, Henry C Woodruff, Adrien Depeursinge, Vincent Andrearczyk, Philippe Lambin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. TCIA Radiology Image Processing for AI and Radiomics.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shruti Atul MaliThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW- Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8307-8051
Nastaran Mohammadian RadThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW- Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Henry C WoodruffThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW- Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7911-5123
Adrien DepeursingeInstitute of Information Systems, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Sierre, Switzerland.
Vincent AndrearczykInstitute of Information Systems, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Sierre, Switzerland.
Philippe LambinThe D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW- Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiomics allows for the quantification of medical images and facilitates precision medicine. Many radiomic features derived from computed tomography (CT) are sensitive to variations across scanners, reconstruction settings, and acquisition protocols. In this phantom study, eight different CT reconstruction parameters were varied to explore image- and feature-level harmonization approaches to improve tissue classification.

methodsVarying reconstructions of an anthropomorphic radiopaque phantom containing three lesion categories (metastasis, hemangioma, and benign cyst) and normal liver tissue were used for evaluating two harmonization methods and their combination: (i) generative adversarial networks (GANs) at the image level; (ii) ComBat at the feature level, and (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii). A total of 93 texture and intensity features were extracted from each tissue class before and after image-level harmonization and were also harmonized at the feature level. Reproducibility and stability were assessed via the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) and pairwise comparisons using paired stability tests. The ability of features to discriminate between tissue classes was assessed by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The global reproducibility and discriminative power were assessed by averaging over the entire dataset and across all tissue types.

resultsComBat improved reproducibility by 31.58% and stability by 5.24%, while GAN increased reproducibility by 8% it reduced stability by 4.33%. Classification analysis revealed that ComBat increased average AUC by 15.19%, whereas GAN decreased AUC by 2.56%.

conclusionWhile GAN qualitatively enhances image harmonization, ComBat provides superior statistical improvements in feature stability and classification performance, highlighting the importance of robust feature-level harmonization in radiomics.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansLiverReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40344028
PMCPMC12063804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.