Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40344017›Full record

ArticleGenetics2025

Expanding biobank pharmacogenomics through machine learning calls of structural variation.

Brett Vanderwerff, Amy L Pasternak, Lars G Fritsche, Emily Bertucci-Richter, Snehal Patil, Michael Boehnke, Xiang Zhou, Sebastian Zöllner, Daniel L Hertz, Matthew Zawistowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brett VanderwerffDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Amy L PasternakDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Lars G FritscheDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Emily Bertucci-RichterDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Snehal PatilDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Michael BoehnkeDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6442-7754
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Sebastian ZöllnerDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Daniel L HertzDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Matthew ZawistowskiDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3005-083X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biobanks linking genetic data with clinical health records provide exciting opportunities for pharmacogenomic (PGx) research on genetic variation and drug response. Designed as central and multiuse resources, biobanks can facilitate diverse PGx research efforts, including the study of drug efficacy and adverse effects. Specialized PGx alleles and phenotypes are critical for such studies and can be conveniently called from existing array-based genotypes routinely collected in most biobanks. We describe a central callset of PGx alleles and phenotypes in over 80,000 participants of the Michigan Genomics Initiative (MGI) biobank, created using the PyPGx software on Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine-imputed genotypes. The array-based PGx allele calls demonstrate concordance (>92%) with a set of PCR-validated alleles collected during clinical care, but do not identify PGx alleles dependent on structural variation, including the clinically important CYP2D6*5 deletion. To address this, we developed a support vector machine trained on genotype array single nucleotide variant probe intensities to classify CYP2D6*5 carriers. This method had >99% accuracy and reclassified ∼7% of African American and ∼4% of White MGI participants to lower activity metabolizer phenotypes, predicting higher risks of adverse drug reactions. We demonstrate that central PGx callsets created with existing tools and genetic data can be augmented by customized calls for challenging alleles based on structural variants to broaden the research potential and clinical utility of biobanks. These PGx callsets can be created in biobanks with existing array-based genotype data and highlight the utility of advanced computational methods in PGx allele identification.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksMachine LearningPharmacogeneticsAllelesCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6GenotypeHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6arraybiobankcyp2d6genotypingmachine learningpharmacogeneticspharmacogenomicsstar allele

Identifiers

PMID40344017
PMCPMC13031175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.