Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343932›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Continuity of care interventions for people with stroke and their caregivers: A scoping review protocol.

Meera Premnazeer, Sarah E P Munce, Mark T Bayley, Kristina M Kokorelias, Monique Gill, Orianna L Scali, Jill I Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meera PremnazeerTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-8441
Sarah E P MunceTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark T BayleyTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kristina M KokoreliasTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Monique GillTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Orianna L ScaliTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7763-4660
Jill I CameronTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-1572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe needs of people with stroke and caregivers' change as they transition across the stroke care continuum from initial symptom onset to community living. Continuity of care interventions may support these changing needs. Continuity of care refers to care provided to individuals that is coherent, connected, and consistent across settings. Interventions have been developed to enhance continuity of care, but to date, no reviews have identified the core components of these interventions specific to various care transitions.

objectiveTo examine the literature on continuity of care interventions that address the needs of people with stroke and/or their caregivers specific to stroke care transitions.

methodsThe study is guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping reviews. The search will be conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, PsycINFO, and EMBASE, restricting to articles in English. Core concepts of stroke (e.g., ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke) and continuity of care (e.g., early supported discharge) and their synonyms will be used as search terms. Two reviewers will assess articles for inclusion. Data will be extracted and synthesised using quantitative descriptive analysis and deductive content analysis. A steering committee, consisting of people with lived experiences, researchers, and healthcare professionals, will discuss the charted data, and identify any gaps in the literature. DISCUSSION: This research will identify the components of continuity of care interventions, the specific transitions that they address, and any variability in components across different transitions. This research will identify gaps in the continuity of care literature such as where transition interventions are needed.

Indexed as

CaregiversContinuity of Patient CareStrokeHumansScoping Reviews as TopicStroke Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40343932
PMCPMC12063880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.