Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343695›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2025

Safety of Stimulants Across Patient Populations: A Meta-Analysis.

Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Tiago Paiva Prudente, Talia F Mayerson, Marcella M Mignosa, Isabela Oliveira Oliva, Marc N Potenza, Oluwole O Jegede, Gustavo A Angarita

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Henrique Nunes Pereira OlivaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Tiago Paiva PrudenteSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Talia F MayersonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Marcella M MignosaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Isabela Oliveira OlivaSchool of Medicine, Centro Universitario FIPMoc, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marc N PotenzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Oluwole O JegedeDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Gustavo A AngaritaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Aberrant Synaptic Plasticity in Cocaine Use Disorder: A 11C UCB J PET StudyR01DA052454 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ANGARITA, GUSTAVO ADOLFO · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Assessing central muscarinic acetylcholine type-1 receptors in cocaine use disorder with 11C-LSN3172176.R33DA053592 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GUSTAVO Adolfo ANGARITA · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052454NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA053592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The use of stimulant medications has expanded substantially beyond the traditional treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to encompass a variety of other clinical conditions. Understanding the safety of these medications is important as their use increases across diverse patient populations. Objective: To assess the safety of stimulant medications as reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and other amphetamines. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from July 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025, using CINAHL, Embase, PubMed or MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science for studies published since 2000. Keywords included safety, adverse event, side effect, amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, stimulant, lisdexamfetamine, and methylphenidate. Study Selection: RCTs published between January 1, 2000, and December 13, 2024, were included. These trials investigated the safety of stimulants in various clinical conditions, including ADHD, depression, binge eating disorder, schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, and stimulant use disorders as well as in healthy individuals. Trials not focused on safety or adverse events (AEs) of stimulants, nonoriginal research, nonhuman research, trials with concomitant prescriptions other than stimulants, and trials without a placebo group were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Independent reviewers extracted study data, and a random-effects model was used to pool results. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the risk ratio (RR) of developing any AE in participants taking stimulants vs placebo. Results: A total of 93 RCTs were included after exclusions. The methodological quality assessment of the included trials showed overall low or unclear risk of bias. Trials with a duration of up to 52 weeks showed that stimulant medications were associated with an increased risk of overall AEs compared with placebo (RR, 1.34; 90% CI, 1.27-1.41), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 67%). Statistical significance of this finding was maintained when subgroups (ie, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and other amphetamines) were separately analyzed. Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis found an increased risk of overall AEs associated with stimulants compared with placebo. Future research could provide more standardized and consistent assessments of this outcome and may improve understanding about misuse risk.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsHumansLisdexamfetamine DimesylateMethylphenidateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCentral Nervous System StimulantsLisdexamfetamine DimesylateMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID40343695
PMCPMC12065045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.