SynthesisJAMA network open2025
Safety of Stimulants Across Patient Populations: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The effects of psychedelics on attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder - a systematic review.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2026Review
- Innovative Nanomaterial-Based Approaches for the Recognition of Amphetamine in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Management.Analytical science advances · 2026Review
- Case for caution in expanding attention deficit hyperactivity disorder prescribing.Internal medicine journal · 2026Review
- Psychiatric safety of methylphenidate in adults with major depressive disorder: a 1-year retrospective cohort study of 6,422 patients.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Implications of the Enhanced Games: Performance Enhancing Drugs in Competition and Recreation.Sports medicine - open · 2026Review
- Sleep alterations in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Urgent response is needed to address the stimulant-fentanyl related overdose crisis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The use of stimulant medications has expanded substantially beyond the traditional treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to encompass a variety of other clinical conditions. Understanding the safety of these medications is important as their use increases across diverse patient populations. Objective: To assess the safety of stimulant medications as reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and other amphetamines. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from July 1, 2024, through February 28, 2025, using CINAHL, Embase, PubMed or MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science for studies published since 2000. Keywords included safety, adverse event, side effect, amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, stimulant, lisdexamfetamine, and methylphenidate. Study Selection: RCTs published between January 1, 2000, and December 13, 2024, were included. These trials investigated the safety of stimulants in various clinical conditions, including ADHD, depression, binge eating disorder, schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, and stimulant use disorders as well as in healthy individuals. Trials not focused on safety or adverse events (AEs) of stimulants, nonoriginal research, nonhuman research, trials with concomitant prescriptions other than stimulants, and trials without a placebo group were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Independent reviewers extracted study data, and a random-effects model was used to pool results. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the risk ratio (RR) of developing any AE in participants taking stimulants vs placebo. Results: A total of 93 RCTs were included after exclusions. The methodological quality assessment of the included trials showed overall low or unclear risk of bias. Trials with a duration of up to 52 weeks showed that stimulant medications were associated with an increased risk of overall AEs compared with placebo (RR, 1.34; 90% CI, 1.27-1.41), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 67%). Statistical significance of this finding was maintained when subgroups (ie, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and other amphetamines) were separately analyzed. Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis found an increased risk of overall AEs associated with stimulants compared with placebo. Future research could provide more standardized and consistent assessments of this outcome and may improve understanding about misuse risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.