ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2025
A framework for conducting clinical trials involving 3D printing of medicines at the point-of-care.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation of pharmaceutical 3D printing to clinical point-of-care and industrial manufacturing.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Review
- 3D-printed polypills for personalized medicine and precision oral drug delivery in pharmaceutical practice: A review.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Precision Pediatric Cancer Nanomedicine: Advancing Personalized Nano Therapies to Reduce Non-Communicable Diseases Through AI-Driven 3D-Printed Drugs.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Systematic review of 3D-printed surgical devices for austere environments: an evaluation guideline.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Paediatric Medicines: Formulation, Process, and Regulatory Considerations.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Beyond Dysphagia in Parkinson's Disease: 3D Printing of Orally Disintegrating Tablets (ODTs) for Optimized Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in 3D-Printed Drug Delivery and Screening Platforms for Bone Disease Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Head and Neck 3D Bioprinting-A Review on Recent Advancements in Soft Tissue 3D Bioprinting and Medical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of 3D printing (3DP) technologies into personalized medicine manufacture at the point-of-care is garnering significant interest due to its potential to create tailored drug products with precise dosages and other unique attributes. Both preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated promising outcomes, including pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, improved patient acceptability, enhanced adherence, and the ability to produce consistent, reproducible dosage forms with accurate drug distribution. Some compounding pharmacies around the world are already incorporating 3DP into standard practice for simpler therapeutic treatments. However, further clinical evaluation is required for more complex treatments, such as multi-drug polypills. Conducting clinical trials involving 3DP technologies presents several challenges, including navigating evolving regulatory frameworks, addressing ethical and legal concerns, and complying with new point-of-care manufacturing guidelines. Although regulatory agencies are beginning to adapt their policies to accommodate 3DP, the absence of a comprehensive framework still creates uncertainty for pharmacists and healthcare providers. This article explores the planning and execution of clinical trials involving 3D printed medicines, with a focus on regulatory barriers, patient recruitment, compliance, and the integration of specialized equipment and expertise. It also discusses the implementation of 3DP for personalized drug manufacturing within hospital settings and offers guidance for obtaining clinical trial approval from the Spanish Agency for Medicine and Health Products (AEMPS). By providing these insights and recommendations, this article aims to support international harmonization and facilitate the adoption of 3DP technologies in clinical trials globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.