Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343689›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025

Current Rehabilitation Principles Following Meniscus Repairs.

Jill K Monson, Luke V Tollefson, Christopher M LaPrade, Robert F LaPrade

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jill K MonsonTwin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan, 2700 Viking Circle, Eagan, MN, 55121, USA. jillmonson@tcomn.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8584-8614
Luke V TollefsonTwin Cities Orthopedics - Edina, 4010 W. 65 th Street, Edina, MN, 55435, USA.
Christopher M LaPradeTwin Cities Orthopedics - Edina, 4010 W. 65 th Street, Edina, MN, 55435, USA.
Robert F LaPradeTwin Cities Orthopedics - Edina, 4010 W. 65 th Street, Edina, MN, 55435, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to synthesize current science on meniscus anatomy and biomechanics and repair techniques to create an empirical foundation for postoperative rehabilitation precautions and guidelines, including timelines, clinical and performance-based criteria for return to activity, to maximize both meniscal healing potential and patient recovery. RECENT

findingsRecent literature has focused on meniscus repair rather than debridement, and rehabilitation protocols should be designed to optimize healing. Complex, unstable tears, like root and radial tears, disrupt hoop stress and warrant a more conservative protocol including 6 weeks of non-weightbearing; however, more stable tears, like ramp and vertical tears, can often weight bear immediately after surgery. All protocols should emphasize early protected joint motion. Return to activity guidelines remain ill-defined but this review explores evidence-based recommendations for timelines, strength and performance testing. Patients typically should wait ≥ 4 months for a return to activity and the presence of joint line tenderness or effusion could be a sign of delayed/failed healing. It is essential for therapists to know the size, type, and location of a meniscus repair to optimize patient outcomes. Guidelines for weight bearing, range of motion, strength training, and return to activity should vary per tear type and repair technique and recovery should be both time- and criteria-based. Return to activity should align with healing time, objective clinical and performance testing, and clinical and imaging exam findings. Future research should aim to optimize repair techniques and rehabilitation protocols, specifically further study on the timing to initiate weightbearing, early motion, and return to activity.

Indexed as

KneeMeniscusMeniscus repairMeniscus root tearRadial tearRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40343689
PMCPMC12283527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.