Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343670›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Home-based self-management using Traditional Chinese Medicine techniques: empowerment and risks in breast cancer survivors' fulfillment of health-deviation self-care requisites.

Fei-Yi Zhao, Peijie Xu, Gerard A Kennedy, Li-Ping Yue, Wen-Jing Zhang, Yan-Mei Wang, Yuen-Shan Ho, Qiang-Qiang Fu, Russell Conduit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fei-Yi ZhaoDepartment of Nursing, School of International Medical Technology, Shanghai Sanda University, Shanghai, 201209, People's Republic of China.
Peijie XuSchool of Computing Technologies, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Gerard A KennedySchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Li-Ping YueDepartment of Nursing, School of International Medical Technology, Shanghai Sanda University, Shanghai, 201209, People's Republic of China.
Wen-Jing ZhangShanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200071, People's Republic of China.
Yan-Mei WangShanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200071, People's Republic of China.
Yuen-Shan HoSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, People's Republic of China. janice.ys.ho@polyu.edu.hk.
Qiang-Qiang FuYangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200090, People's Republic of China. qiangqiang.fu@tongji.edu.cn.
Russell ConduitSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimTraditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)-based self-care is widely practiced among cancer survivors worldwide, particularly in China. For Chinese breast cancer survivors (BCSs), it embodies both an expression of ethnomedical cultural identity and a means of health self-empowerment. However, this practice often occurs without professional supervision, posing potential risks. This study aims to explore BCSs' experiences and perspectives to elucidate the purposes and influencing factors behind their home-based TCM self-care engagement, thereby informing future optimization strategies.

methodsA focused ethnographic design was utilized, with a research framework integrating the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Results were mapped onto constructs of a behavioral wheel derived from the COM-B/TDF matrix. Data analysis followed conventional qualitative content analysis procedures.

resultsParticipants viewed TCM-based self-care as a complement to rather than a substitute for standard care, primarily for relapse prevention. Facilitators of this practice included (1) strong cultural beliefs and confidence in ethnic medicine, (2) a sense of health responsibility, (3) heightened internal health locus of control, (4) prior beneficial experiences, (5) incentives from online key opinion leaders and fellow survivors, (6) support from family and peers, and (7) reduced time and financial costs. Barriers were (1) insufficient TCM knowledge and skills and (2) uncertainty about efficacy; and (3) safety concerns. Additionally, (1) the home-based treatment setting and (2) the immature internet-based TCM nurse service acted as both barriers and facilitators.

conclusionsThe interrelated facilitators and barriers underscore that BCSs' home-based TCM self-care constitutes a complex medical-sociological issue involving cultural, economic, information communication, and healthcare service delivery dimensions. Only a minority of survivors are aware of the possible adverse medical consequences. Within a patient-centered framework, healthcare providers must identify the unique health-deviation self-care requisites of BCSs in a culturally sensitive manner, and partner with them in their self-health management, such as telemonitoring their home-based TCM self-care using eHealth technologies. There is also an urgent need to develop clinical guidelines or expert consensus to support these practices. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: BCSs' TCM self-care represents an intentional health autonomy strategy beyond conventional biomedical dominance, necessitating professional supervision to equilibrate health self-empowerment and iatrogenic risk.

Indexed as

Cancer rehabilitationComplementary and alternative medicineEthnographyIntegrative carePatient experiencesQualitative studySelf-administrationSelf-treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.