ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Impact of GnRH agonist trigger on subsequent follicular phase length in ART cycles.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
research questionDoes the use of GnRH agonist trigger versus hCG trigger affect the length of the subsequent follicular phase in women?
designA retrospective cohort study analyzing 196 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with freeze-all for PGT-M at a university-affiliated fertility center; 132 received GnRH agonist trigger, and 64 received hCG trigger.
resultsThe GnRH agonist group demonstrated a significantly longer subsequent follicular phase compared to the hCG group (18.98 ± 3.54 vs. 16.06 ± 3.13 days, P < .001), with extended follicular phase occurring in 90.2% versus 60.9% of cycles (P < .001). Both groups had comparable antral follicle counts (14.52 ± 7.71 vs. 13.00 ± 15.36, P = .748). Multiple regression analysis identified GnRH agonist trigger as a significant independent predictor of subsequent follicular phase length (coefficient = 4.552, 95% CI: 3.058-6.045, P < .001), along with BMI (coefficient = 0.188, 95% CI: 0.019-0.357, P = .030). The model explained 31.4% of the variance in follicular phase length (F = 7.516, P < .001). After adjusting for confounding variables, pregnancy rates were comparable between groups (OR = 1.763, 95% CI: 0.798-3.505, P = .173).
conclusionsThe GnRH agonist trigger prolongs the subsequent follicular phase compared to the hCG trigger without compromising pregnancy rates. BMI showed a statistically significant but modest association with follicular phase length that requires further validation. These findings have important implications for optimizing the timing of frozen embryo transfer in subsequent cycles and may facilitate more personalized monitoring protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.