ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Mediation Mendelian randomization analysis of immune cell phenotypes and glioma risk: unveiling the regulation of cerebrospinal fluid metabolites.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveGliomas, particularly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are the most common primary central nervous system tumors in adults and are notoriously difficult to treat due to their high heterogeneity and invasiveness. Despite advances in molecular diagnostics and personalized therapies, prognosis remains poor. The immune system plays a critical role in glioma progression. This study employed mediation Mendelian randomization analysis to explore the relationships between immune cell phenotypes, cerebrospinal fluid metabolites, and glioma, aiming to uncover potential mechanisms of tumor progression and immune evasion.
methodIn this study, we employed several analytical methods including IVW, MR Egger, Simple mode, Weighted median, and Weighted mode, with IVW results being considered the primary basis. We assessed heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and used leave-one-out analysis to determine sensitivity, ensuring the stability and reliability of the results. The potential mediating effects of cerebrospinal fluid metabolites were investigated to explore the underlying mechanisms linking immune cell function and glioma. The GWAS data for immune cells, cerebrospinal fluid metabolites, and glioma used in this study were sourced from public databases.
resultWe identified nine risk immune cell phenotypes for glioma (such as CD19 on IgD( +) CD24(-)), and ten protective immune cell phenotypes (such as CD11c on monocytes). Mediation analysis revealed that levels of 7-alpha-hydroxy-3-oxo-4-cholestenoate (7-hoca) (MP = - 14.6%) and Palmitoyl dihydrosphingomyelin (d18:0/16:0) (MP = 7.9%) partially mediated the relationship between CD3 on CD39( +) resting Treg cells and glioma. Additionally, 7-hoca levels (MP = - 12.3%) and Phenyllactate (pla) levels (MP = 4.12%) partially mediated the association between FSC-A on NKT cells and glioma. Furthermore, Glycerophosphoinositol levels (MP = - 12.1%) and Orotate levels (MP = - 11.4%) partially mediated the relationship between Granulocyte adenylyl cyclase (Granulocyte AC) and glioma.
conclusionThis study identified that specific immune cell phenotypes directly influence glioma risk and indirectly modulate this risk through cerebrospinal fluid metabolites. CD19 on IgD( +) CD24(-) B cells were identified as risk factors, while CD11c on monocytes were protective. Metabolites like 7-hoca and glycerophosphoinositol play key mediating roles. These findings enhance our understanding of glioma pathophysiology and suggest that immune modulation and metabolic intervention may be promising therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.