ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Survival of primary total knee arthroplasty in a modern anatomic implant with and without a short stem extension.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn primary conventional TKA, the tibial fixation is achieved by the epiphyseal and metaphyseal zone. One of those two zones of fixation, can be compromised by the local bone quality (bone micro-architecture and resistance), previous surgery or decreased surface of contact, leading to micro-mobility of the implant and potentially leading to aseptic loosening (AL). It was our hypothesis that the addition of a short fully cemented stem would improve the metaphyseal and epiphyseal fixation of the implant. To verify this hypothesis, the goals of this retrospective study were therefore to compare if (1) The presence of a short, stubby stem will dissipate stress and decrease micro-mobility at the epiphyseal level resulting in less radiolucent lines around the tibial component. (2) Short stem primary TKA may improve survivorship of the implant in patients potentially at risk for aseptic loosening. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective cohort study of 326 patients operated with a morphometric implant between 2013 and 2018. A short stubby stem was added to the tibial implant, if at the time of the tibial cut, the surgeon judged the epiphyseal bone quality to be poor or a smaller tibial size was necessary. All primary TKA were radiographically evaluated. RLLs were recorded and described according to their radiological aspect, localization, time of appearance and their progression over time. Survivorship was compared in the 2 groups using the national joint registry.
results71 TKAs out of 326 (22%) were stemmed. Of the 255 TKAs without stem, 53 (21%) showed RLLs under the tibial base plate and 1 case (0.4%) was revised for potential AL of the tibial implant. No RLLs were observed in the group of stemmed implants and no revisions for aseptic loosening were needed. Patients with stubby stems were elderly women with risk factors for osteoporosis or young men in need for correction of big coronal deformities.
conclusionA short stubby stem extension can reduce the rate of RLLs and AL in primary TKA, probably by adding metaphyseal fixation to the classic epiphyseal fixation of the tibia and by a reduction in micro- and macro-motion of the tibial component. Based on the results of our study, the addition of a short cemented stubby stem decreased the rate of RLL with no revision observed in the stemmed group during the study period. The used knee system allows this option. Intra-operative decision can be made easily when risk factors such as osteoporosis, female gender, big deformities, obesity can be identified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40343551What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.