ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Fundus fluorescein angiography findings in eyes initially diagnosed with idiopathic epiretinal membrane.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to investigate the fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) findings in eyes initially diagnosed with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) and assess their impact on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
methodsThis retrospective comparative study included 136 patients (151 eyes) diagnosed with iERM and a control group of 121 healthy fellow eyes. All patients underwent FFA and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The primary outcomes summarized the characteristics of FFA and OCT in patients with iERM, and analyzed the relationship between FFA findings and visual acuity.
resultsVascular leakage (P = 0.009) were significantly more prevalent in eyes with iERM compared to controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that optic disc hyperfluorescence (OR 4.05; 95% CI 1.79-9.17; P = 0.001) were more likely to present in eyes with iERM. A lower OCT stage, fovea-recognizable, cellophane macular reflex type were associated with better BCVA.
conclusionOptic disc hyperfluorescence is independent risk factors of iERM. Howerer, these abnormalities do not show a significant association with visual function. The precise etiology remains to be fully elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40343546What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.