Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343542›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Mendelian randomization analysis of immune cell traits and their association with cervical cancer risk.

Jie Yu, Yamei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie YuDepartment of Gynecology, Tongxiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Tongxiang, 314500, China. lovelyyujie@163.com.
Yamei ZhangParty and Government Affairs Office, Tongxiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Tongxiang, 314500, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women worldwide, with a complex pathogenesis involving multiple genetic and immune factors. Immune cells play a critical role in the initiation and progression of tumors. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between various immune cell traits and cervical cancer risk using Mendelian randomization (MR), with the goal of providing new insights and potential targets for the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer.

methodsThis study employed Mendelian randomization analysis, using genetic variants as instrumental variables to evaluate the association between various immune cell traits and cervical cancer risk. By analyzing the effect sizes and statistical significance of different immune cell subsets, and utilizing visual tools such as volcano plots, forest plots, and funnel plots, a comprehensive analysis of the data was conducted.

resultsThe study found a slight positive association between activated secretory CD4 regulatory T cells and cervical cancer risk (OR = 1.001, 95% CI 1.000-1.002, p = 0.001), while resting CD4 regulatory T cells showed a potential protective effect (OR = 0.998, 95% CI 0.997-0.999, p = 0.004). Additionally, CD25 on IgD+ CD38dim B cells approached significance (p = 0.050), suggesting a possible impact. Most other immune cell traits had effect sizes close to zero and showed no significant association with cervical cancer risk.

conclusionAlthough most immune cell traits showed no significant association with cervical cancer risk, these significant findings provide direction for future research and highlight the potential role of specific immune cells in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Causal relationshipCervical cancerImmune cell traitsMendelian randomizationRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40343542
PMCPMC12064510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.