ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Intracranial pressure dynamics, cerebral autoregulation, and brain perfusion after decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: is there a role for invasive monitoring?
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individualising Neurointensive Care of Traumatic Brain Injury: Reduced Signal Complexity Relates to Secondary Insults and Predicts Worse Outcome.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Intracranial Pressure Monitoring, Heart Rate Variability, Baroreflex Sensitivity, and Signal Complexity During Neurointensive Care after Decompressive Craniectomy in Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMalignant middle cerebral artery infarction (MMI) is a severe neurological condition. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is an established lifesaving surgical treatment. However, the role of neurocritical care with monitoring and management of the intracranial pressure (ICP), pressure reactivity index (PRx), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and optimal perfusion pressure (CPPopt) remain unclear. This study aims to examine the dynamics of these variables post-DC in relation to clinical outcome.
methodsThis retrospective study included 70 MMI patients who underwent DC with ICP monitoring of at least 12 hours and available data of clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at 6 months). The associations between mRS and cerebral physiology (ICP, PRx, CPP, and ∆CPPopt) was analysed and presented in different outcome heatmaps over the first 7 days following DC.
resultsICP above 15 mmHg was associated with unfavourable outcome, particularly for longer durations. As PRx exceeded zero, outcome worsened progressively, and values above 0.5 correlated to poor outcome regardless of duration. As CPP dropped below 80 mmHg, there was a transition from favourable to unfavourable outcome. Negative ∆CPPopt, particularly below -20 mmHg, corresponded to unfavourable outcome. In two-variable heatmaps, elevated PRx combined with high ICP, low CPP or negative ∆CPPopt correlated with worse outcome.
conclusionInvasive ICP-monitoring may provide prognostic information for long-term recovery in MMI patients post-DC. The study highlighted disease-specific optimal physiological intervals for ICP, PRx, CPP, and ΔCPPopt. Of particular interest, the autoregulatory variable, PRx, influenced the safe and dangerous ICP, CPP, and ∆CPPopt intervals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.