ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Illness perception, cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress in breast cancer patients and spouses: an actor-partner interdependence mediation model.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mediating role of illness perception between Type D personality and psychological distress in preoperative patients with gynecologic cancers: A cross-sectional study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Identifying psychosocial distress phenotypes in postoperative patients with breast cancer: A latent profile analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Exploring the Core Attributes of Quality of Life Among Low-Income Terminal Cancer Patients in China: A Network Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The impact of health literacy on treatment adherence in COPD patients: chain mediation roles of self-efficacy and perceived disease threat.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to examine the relationships between illness perception, cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS), and psychological distress, and the mediating role of CERS in breast cancer patients and their spouses.
methodsA cross-sectional study recruited 305 pairs of breast cancer patients and their spouses to complete the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire, the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-short, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Descriptive statistics, difference analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and the actor-partner interdependence mediation model were conducted.
resultsThere was a significant correlation between illness perception, CERS, and psychological distress in breast cancer patients and their spouses (r = -0.416 ~ 0.522, P < 0.05). Both patients' and spouses' illness perception could directly produce significant actor effects on psychological distress, or indirectly through the mediator of maladaptive or adaptive CERS of their own. Only spouses' illness perception could produce significant partner effect on patients' psychological distress. Moreover, only spouses' illness perception could produce significant effects on patients' psychological distress through patients' or spouses' maladaptive CERS.
conclusionOur findings offered a new perspective on how illness perception, CERS, and psychological distress were interconnected at both personal and dyadic levels. The findings underscored the significance of intervening with breast cancer patients and spouses as a closely knit dyad to promote the adoption of adaptive CERS while reduce the use of maladaptive CERS, which may be associated with lower levels of psychological distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40343525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.