Observational studyArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Sesamoid correction achieved during the learning curve for Scarf-Akin osteotomy without lateral soft-tissue release: a single-centre prospective observational study.
Observational study in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionScarf-Akin osteotomy (with or without lateral soft-tissue release (LSTR)) is commonly performed to treat hallux valgus (HV). An insufficient correction of sesamoids can be a risk factor for early recurrence of the condition. We set out to determine 1) the radiographic correction achieved after Scarf-Akin osteotomy performed without LSTR and 2) the degree of correction of sesamoids obtained during the learning curve of the technique. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective single-centre study, the first 25 feet (25 patients, mean age 55.2 years, 14 left) undergone Scarf-Akin osteotomy without LSTR by a single foot and ankle orthopaedic consultant in his first year of activity were enrolled and followed-up at 1-year. On weightbearing standard pre-operative and 1-year follow-up radiographs two independent observers (senior residents) assessed and compared the hallux valgus angle (HVA), 1st and 2nd intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) and tibial sesamoid position (SP, according to the Hardy and Clapham system). The inter and intraobserver reliability of measurements along with the correlation between the improvement achieved in different parameters and the number of cases performed were tested. Intra and post-operative complications were compared between the early (first 12) and late learning periods.
resultsThe inter and intraobserver agreement for the radiographic parameters investigated was excellent in all cases (ICC always > 0.92). A statistically significant improvement in mean HVA (from 36 ± 9.8 to 16.3 ± 2.8 degrees), mean IMA (from 14.5 ± 2.3 to 9.9 ± 1.5 degrees), mean DMAA (from 19.4 ± 4.4 to 11.4 ± 1.9 degrees) and median SP (from 4 (IQR, 3-6) to 2 (IQR, 1-2) points) was demonstrated in the cohort (p < 0.001 in all cases). There was a strong positive significant correlation between the progression of cases over time and the improvement achieved in terms of SP (R = 0.60, p = 0.003). Conversely, no significant correlation was demonstrated when comparing the improvement obtained in HVA, IMA and DMAA with the number of cases performed (p > 0.05 in all cases). One complication occurred during the first 12 cases (1 transfer metatarsalgia) and 1 during the last 13 (1 intra-operative fracture).
conclusionIn this series, a satisfactory correction of HV after Scarf-Akin osteotomy was obtained without releasing lateral soft-tissues. Beginner surgeons should be aware that restoring sesamoid position may be more challenging as compared to correcting other angles during the first cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.