ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Global research trends in tumor-associated macrophage studies: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross database bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis of nanoplatform mediated tumor associated macrophage reprogramming.Discover nano · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of research trends and hotspots regarding macrophage polarization in lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMacrophages play a critical role in various diseases, including cancer, where their involvement is characterized by a dual nature. There is a growing focus on tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in cancer research due to their complex interactions with tumor biology. With the expanding body of research in this area, a retrospective analysis of published articles is warranted to gain insights into evolving trends. This bibliometric study aims to assist researchers in identifying key areas of interest and emerging directions within the field of TAM research.
methodsA bibliometric analysis was performed using the Bibliometrix Package in R Software and CiteSpace software.
resultsThe volume of research on TAMs continues to increase, with this study identifying major contributors to the field. The focus of research has shifted from traditional methods, such as flow cytometry and histological techniques, toward single-cell omics approaches, which offer unbiased insights into TAM heterogeneity. Current areas of interest include biomarkers, immune therapies, TAM states, tumor microenvironments, macrophage-targeted agents, and the response of TAMs to therapeutic interventions. These topics are anticipated to remain prominent in the near future.
conclusionThe study provides an overview of annual publication trends, influential papers, key journals, frequently used keywords, leading authors, and contributing institutions. It also highlights the interdisciplinary evolution of TAM-related research and the connections between these areas of study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.