ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2025
Moving from minimally invasive to totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery: a retrospective review of outcomes.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transition from Direct-View to Totally Endoscopic Mitral Valve Surgery in an Experienced Minimally Invasive Center: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The 10 Commandments for Moving From Direct Vision to Endoscopic Mitral and Tricuspid Surgery Safely.Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMitral valve surgery has undergone significant advancements with the emergence of minimally invasive mitral surgery harnessing endoscopic technology to facilitate repair through a right anterior thoracotomy. Further refinement within the field has borne the novel totally endoscopic approach, reducing incision size, and surgical trauma, to 3 cm. While there is evidence to support non-inferiority of minimally invasive techniques compared to a traditional sternotomy, a knowledge gap exists regarding the comparative safety and efficacy between minimally invasive modalities, necessitating.
methodsA retrospective review of outcomes following totally endoscopic and minimally invasive mitral valve surgery by right anterior thoracotomy was completed. One hundred eighty-six patients were included, all operations having been performed by a single surgeon, between January 2019 and June 2023. The hypothesis posits that the former offers an equivalence in repair while reducing postoperative pain, bleeding from the wound and enhancing cosmesis.
resultsWhile low 30-day mortality rates were seen in both cohorts, the totally endoscopic group exhibited lower rates of patients discharged with opiates (16% vs 23%), reduced blood product transfusion requirements (33% vs 43%) and shorter postoperative stays (mean of 9.2 days vs 11.4 days).
conclusionsMoving from minimally invasive to totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery has been a positive experience with key patient advantages characterized by smaller incisions and avoidance of rib spreading. In this dataset, improved patient outcomes such as postoperative bleeding, pain, length of hospital stay and cosmesis were observed with all limitations given its fully uncontrolled nature. Validation of these findings warrants a larger study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.