ArticleCroatian medical journal2025
The painless ST-elevation myocardial infarction equivalent: a case report.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report presents the case of a 61-year-old patient who experienced sporadically occurring episodes of chest pain lasting approximately 15 minutes. The initial electrocardiogram (ECG) showed unspecific repolarization disturbances but no ST-elevation indicative of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, upon closer examination, biphasic T waves were detected, suggestive of specific repolarization abnormalities. The conventional Wellens criteria were met, possibly indicating an etiopathogenetic correlation with the patient's complaints. Subsequent coronary angiography revealed a functional occlusion of the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery, which was treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/drug eluting stent. It also revealed a severely stenosed distal circumflex artery, indicating a two-vessel coronary disease. If we had used only conventional STEMI criteria, this patient would have certainly been missed. Therefore, when evaluating patients presenting with chest pain, it is imperative to consider non-occlusion infarction ECG abnormalities, known as STEMI equivalents. This case, moreover, highlights the importance of the non-officially proposed occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI)/non-OMI paradigm instead of the old STEMI/non-STEMI dichotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40343439PMC12093120What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.