ArticleInfection & chemotherapy2025
Successful Management of Pediatric Patients with Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia Using a Clinical Care Pathway in Egypt.
Article in Infection & chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCriteria for home management of low-risk febrile neutropenia remain challenging in supportive care. Careful selection of low-risk febrile neutropenic pediatric patients can improve outcomes and decrease complications. In the current study, we implemented a clinical pathway for pediatric patients presenting to the emergency room department with low-risk febrile neutropenia by using strict inclusion criteria. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a prospective study from December 2021 to September 2022; all patients presented to the emergency room department were screened for pathway evaluation, and risk stratification was performed using a strict checklist. Patients were included if they met the low-risk criteria. Thorough clinical and laboratory assessments were performed on these patients. All patients started oral antibiotics and were instructed about alarming signs. Patients were followed up at the outpatient clinic on days 3 and 7.
resultsTwo hundred and three patients with 200 episodes of low-risk febrile neutropenia were enrolled; one hundred and ten were males, and 90 were females; underlying hematological malignancies accounted for 54.0%. On day three, 181 patients out of 200 were afebrile for 24 hours (90.0%), and 47.5% were still neutropenic. At day seven, all study patients were afebrile, had recovering counts, and stopped antibiotics regardless of the count. Absolute neutrophil count recovery on day seven was achieved in 95.5% of patients.
conclusionOur inclusion criteria for patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia proved to be safe without deaths or intensive care unit admission and successful with the lowest admission rate, so it can be used for a stewardship program to avoid unnecessary patient admissions and help healthcare givers to optimize patient allocation and follow-up safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.