ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2025
Thromboelastography Maximum Amplitude Is a Valuable Biomarker for Early Atherosclerosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nitric oxide exacerbates systemic inflammation in adults with severe acute respiratory.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Joint association of systemic inflammatory response index and thromboelastography maximum amplitude with the risk of early atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Identification of coagulation-related biomarkers in osteoarthritis and immune infiltration analysis based on bioinformatics.Hereditas · 2025Article
- Thromboelastography Maximum Amplitude Is a Valuable Biomarker for Early Atherosclerosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypercoagulability contributes to atherosclerosis (AS) progression in individuals suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and thromboelastography (TEG) is a valuable diagnostic tool. This hospital-based cross-sectional study assessed the clinical efficacy of TEG parameters in detecting hypercoagulability and subclinical AS by purposively sampling 372 RA patients and 105 healthy controls. TEG indices, conventional coagulation markers, and biochemical profiles were assessed. Multivariable logistic modeling and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were utilized to identify independent risk factors for early AS in patients with RA. Our results indicated that patients with RA experienced a hypercoagulable state in comparison to controls, which was particularly pronounced in RA patients with early AS compared to their non-AS counterparts. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the TEG maximum amplitude (MA) is an independent risk factor for early AS in patients with RA, with an odds ratio of 1.219 and a 95% confidence interval of 1.128-1.317. Additional independent risk factors identified are fibrinogen (FIB), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and the adjusted atherogenic index of plasma (aAIP). ROC analysis revealed that MA achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.711 (sensitivity: 71.5%; specificity: 63.5%) for early AS diagnosis. Combining with FIB, LDL-C, and aAIP significantly enhanced diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.831 (sensitivity: 77.6%; specificity: 75.3%). These findings highlight MA as a valuable biomarker for early detection of AS in patients with RA. Furthermore, integrating MA with FIB, LDL-C, and aAIP improves diagnostic accuracy, supporting its clinical role in risk stratification and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.