Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343390›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2025

Cardiac Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Adjuvant Setting: An FDA Pooled Analysis.

Asma Dilawari, Mori J Krantz, Ilynn Bulatao, Hee-Koung Joeng, Marc Neilson, Suparna Wedam, Xin Gao, Mallorie H Fiero, Abhilasha Nair, Marc Theoret and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Asma DilawariCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Mori J KrantzCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-4041-7660
Ilynn BulataoCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4706-0372
Hee-Koung JoengCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Marc NeilsonOncology Center of Excellence (OCE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Suparna WedamCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Xin GaoCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Mallorie H FieroCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Abhilasha NairCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Marc TheoretCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Laleh Amiri-KordestaniCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. By releasing blocks (checkpoints) on the immune system, they elicit powerful antitumor effects. Despite improving survival, ICIs are associated with serious cardiac toxicities. Previous reports have focused on advanced cancer; cardiotoxicity data are therefore limited in the curative setting. We evaluated ICI cardiotoxicity in the non-metastatic setting, where long-term cardiac safety is a growing public health concern.

methodsICIs approved in the adjuvant setting were pooled and trials with combination chemotherapy were excluded. Cardiac adverse events (AEs) and emerging cardio-metabolic risks (hyperglycemia, weight gain, hypothyroidism) were assessed. The relative risk (RR) of cardiotoxicity was assessed.

resultsTen randomized controlled trials of atezolizumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab in multiple solid tumors were evaluated; among 9244 patients, 5338 received ICIs. No trial performed routine cardiac monitoring. Six percent of ICI patients vs. 4.6% in placebo (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04, 1.49) had a cardiac AE and 13 (0.2%) of ICI patients experienced a fatal cardiac AE (RR 4.76, 95% CI 1.07, 21.06). Older age and male sex were associated with a higher risk for cardiac fatality. Arrhythmia was the most common cardiac AE; hypothyroidism was more frequent (14% vs. 2.5%) among ICI-treated patients.

conclusionThis is the largest pooled analysis of cardiac AEs associated with ICIs in the adjuvant setting. Despite no formalized testing for subclinical cardiotoxicity, ICI treatment increased cardiac AEs. These findings are relevant for long-term cancer survivors, clinicians, and particularly in new drug development, where cardiotoxicity may be substantially underestimated.

Indexed as

CardiotoxicityImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsadjuvantcancercardio oncologycardiotoxicityimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40343390
PMCPMC12059289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.