Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343275›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Unsupervised alignment reveals structural commonalities and differences in neural representations of natural scenes across individuals and brain areas.

Ken Takeda, Kota Abe, Jun Kitazono, Masafumi Oizumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ken TakedaGraduate School of Arts and Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kota AbeGraduate School of Arts and Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun KitazonoGraduate School of Data Science, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masafumi OizumiGraduate School of Arts and Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience research aims to identify universal neural mechanisms underlying sensory information encoding by comparing neural representations across individuals, typically using Representational Similarity Analysis. However, traditional methods assume direct stimulus correspondence across individuals, limiting the exploration of other possibilities. To address this, we propose an unsupervised alignment framework based on Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport, which identifies correspondences between neural representations solely from internal similarity structures, without relying on stimulus labels. Applying this method to Neuropixels recordings in mice and fMRI data in humans viewing natural scenes, we found that the neural representations in the same visual cortical areas can be well aligned across individuals in an unsupervised manner. Furthermore, alignment across different brain areas is influenced by factors beyond the visual hierarchy, with higher-order visual areas aligning well with each other, but not with lower-order areas. This unsupervised approach reveals more nuanced structural commonalities and differences in neural representations than conventional methods.

Indexed as

Cognitive neurosciencePsychology

Identifiers

PMID40343275
PMCPMC12059663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.