Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343231›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

When is Growth the Greatest? Spine and Total Body Growth in Idiopathic Scoliosis Through Sanders Maturation Stages 2, 3A, 3B, and 4.

Yusuke Hori, Bryan Menapace, Norihiro Isogai, Sadettin Ciftci, Burak Kaymaz, Luiz Carlos Almeida da Silva, Kenneth J Rogers, Petya K Yorgova, Peter G Gabos, Suken A Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. What's New in Spine Surgery.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yusuke HoriNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5921-3479
Bryan MenapaceNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.
Norihiro IsogaiNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9365-530X
Sadettin CiftciNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.
Burak KaymazNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6207-8063
Luiz Carlos Almeida da SilvaNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7464-4269
Kenneth J RogersNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4157-6009
Petya K YorgovaNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-9618
Peter G GabosNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.
Suken A ShahNemours Children's Hospital, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-0138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sanders maturation stages (SMS) 2 to 4 represent periods of rapid growth and are considered ideal candidates for growth modulation surgery, such as anterior vertebral body tethering. A detailed assessment of spine growth during these stages is essential but limited. This study aimed to clarify the differences in growth rates for spine and total body height across SMS 2, 3A, 3B, and 4, as well as to assess cumulative growth until skeletal maturity for these stages. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, case-control longitudinal study evaluated consecutive patients with idiopathic scoliosis staged SMS 2 to 4. T1-S1 spine height, total body height, and curve magnitude were measured at each visit. Monthly growth rates for spine and total body height were calculated between baseline and first follow-up visit (6-12 months). In a subset followed to skeletal maturity, cumulative spine and total body height gain were assessed. To account for height loss due to scoliosis, spine and total body height were adjusted for curve magnitude using validated formulas. Multivariate linear regression models were employed to evaluate the relationship between SMS and growth, adjusting for confounding factors. Results: A total of 517 patients (68% female) were included. Spine height growth was highest in patients at SMS 3A, approximately 1.4 times stage 2, 1.5 times stage 3B, and 1.8 times stage 4. Total body height growth rates were comparable between SMS 2 and 3A, both significantly exceeding SMS 3B and 4. Among 314 patients followed to skeletal maturity, cumulative growth in spine and total body height was greatest in patients at SMS 2. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that spinal growth was most pronounced in patients at SMS 3A, while total body height growth was greatest during SMS 2 and 3A. Less mature patients exhibited greater cumulative growth potential in both spine and total body height. These findings provide crucial insights for determining the optimal timing of growth modulation surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III Case-control study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID40343231
PMCPMC12055122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.