Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343212›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2025

Visual communication of public health data: a scoping review.

Michael Arthur Ofori, Stella Lartey, Polina Durneva, Niharika Jha, Nidhi Mittal, Shongkour Roy, Zebunnesa Zeba, Stella Chirwa, Nichole Saulsberry-Scarboro, Michelle Taylor and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael Arthur Ofori *School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Stella Lartey *Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Polina Durneva *Department of Management Information Systems, Fogelman College of Business & Economics, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Niharika Jha *School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Nidhi Mittal *School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Shongkour Roy *School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Zebunnesa Zeba *School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Stella Chirwa *School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Nichole Saulsberry-Scarboro *School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Michelle Taylor *Shelby County Health Department, Memphis, TN, United States.
Ashish Joshi *School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Visual communications (VC) play a crucial role in effectively conveying public health data to diverse audiences, including policymakers, healthcare professionals, and the general public. Although the U.S. government invests heavily in health data and data accessibility, health data are not entirely accessible or easily understood. This can be attributed to data sharing and visualization challenges. VC challenges have created public health information gaps which are compounded in emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially impacting poor health outcomes and increasing health inequities. Objective: To examine visualization tools and techniques effective for public health visual data communication. Methods: A scoping review was conducted to summarize the available evidence related to visualization techniques and tools for public health visual data communication as well as related principles and best practices. Original peer-reviewed articles published in English that involve visualization, user-centered design of visual public health applications/interfaces, visual analytics, infographics, or dashboards from PubMed database from 2020 to 2024 were included. Also, review articles, commentaries, editorials, posters, systematic and scoping articles were excluded from this review. In all, twenty-eight (28) studies were included. Results: There were 25 different visualization techniques identified which included charts and graphs (e.g., bar charts, line charts, pie charts, bubble charts, box plots, scatter plots), maps (e.g., choropleth maps, hotspot maps, and heatmaps), and specialized visualizations (e.g., sunburst diagrams, alluvial plots, upset plots, circos). These visuals were displayed employing different programming and statistical tools and libraries like R, Python, Power BI, Tableau, ArcGIS, and custom web-based applications. The visuals measured different types of data accessibility, pattern and trends identification, association and relationships of univariate and bivariate data, as well as exploring multidimensional forms of health data. The visualizations were applied in different public health domains, such as HIV prevention and care, public health communication, interventions, surveillance, policy measures and decision-making, and improving health education. Conclusion: Dashboards and web-based tools combined with static visualizations like charts, maps, or specialized plots can help with data exploration, pattern recognition, and dissemination of health information. Effective communication of public health data promotes informed decision-making, creates awareness, and leads to improved and better health outcomes.

Indexed as

data visualizationhealth communicationhealth datainteractive dashboardsvisual communication

Identifiers

PMID40343212
PMCPMC12060258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.