ArticleBone reports2025
Artificial intelligence in pediatric osteopenia diagnosis: evaluating deep network classification and model interpretability using wrist X-rays.
Article in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnosis methods for pancreatic cancer with the technique of deep learning: a review and a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in bone research.Bone reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatology: From Algorithms to Clinical Impact in Osteoporosis and Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Fractal gradient divergence-tuned deep belief network for osteoporosis detection using X-ray images.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Automated Risser Grade Assessment of Pelvic Bones Using Deep Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteopenia is a bone disorder that causes low bone density and affects millions of people worldwide. Diagnosis of this condition is commonly achieved through clinical assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). State of the art machine learning (ML) techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer models, have gained increasing popularity in medicine. In this work, we employ six deep networks for osteopenia vs. healthy bone classification using X-ray imaging from the pediatric wrist dataset GRAZPEDWRI-DX. We apply two explainable AI techniques to analyze and interpret visual explanations for network decisions. Experimental results show that deep networks are able to effectively learn osteopenic and healthy bone features, achieving high classification accuracy rates. Among the six evaluated networks, DenseNet201 with transfer learning yielded the top classification accuracy at 95.2 %. Furthermore, visual explanations of CNN decisions provide valuable insight into the blackbox inner workings and present interpretable results. Our evaluation of deep network classification results highlights their capability to accurately differentiate between osteopenic and healthy bones in pediatric wrist X-rays. The combination of high classification accuracy and interpretable visual explanations underscores the promise of incorporating machine learning techniques into clinical workflows for the early and accurate diagnosis of osteopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.