Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343188›Full record

ArticleBone reports2025

Artificial intelligence in pediatric osteopenia diagnosis: evaluating deep network classification and model interpretability using wrist X-rays.

Chelsea E Harris, Lingling Liu, Luiz Almeida, Carolina Kassick, Sokratis Makrogiannis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chelsea E HarrisDivision of Physics, Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, Delaware State University, 1200 N. Dupont Hwy., Dover, 19901, DE, USA.
Lingling LiuDivision of Physics, Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, Delaware State University, 1200 N. Dupont Hwy., Dover, 19901, DE, USA.
Luiz AlmeidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, 2080 Duke University Road, Durham, 27710, NC, USA.
Carolina KassickDivision of Physics, Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, Delaware State University, 1200 N. Dupont Hwy., Dover, 19901, DE, USA.
Sokratis MakrogiannisDivision of Physics, Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, Delaware State University, 1200 N. Dupont Hwy., Dover, 19901, DE, USA.

Funding

Research Capacity CoreU54MD015959 · NIMHD · DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Dorothy Dillard · 2022 to 2026
$22.6M
QUANTITATIVE IMAGE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR STUDIES OF AGING PHENOTYPES AND AGE-RELATED DISEASESSC3GM113754 · NIGMS · DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAKROGIANNIS, SOKRATIS · 2015 to 2024
$686k
NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM113754NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD015959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteopenia is a bone disorder that causes low bone density and affects millions of people worldwide. Diagnosis of this condition is commonly achieved through clinical assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). State of the art machine learning (ML) techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer models, have gained increasing popularity in medicine. In this work, we employ six deep networks for osteopenia vs. healthy bone classification using X-ray imaging from the pediatric wrist dataset GRAZPEDWRI-DX. We apply two explainable AI techniques to analyze and interpret visual explanations for network decisions. Experimental results show that deep networks are able to effectively learn osteopenic and healthy bone features, achieving high classification accuracy rates. Among the six evaluated networks, DenseNet201 with transfer learning yielded the top classification accuracy at 95.2 %. Furthermore, visual explanations of CNN decisions provide valuable insight into the blackbox inner workings and present interpretable results. Our evaluation of deep network classification results highlights their capability to accurately differentiate between osteopenic and healthy bones in pediatric wrist X-rays. The combination of high classification accuracy and interpretable visual explanations underscores the promise of incorporating machine learning techniques into clinical workflows for the early and accurate diagnosis of osteopenia.

Indexed as

Deep learningExplainable AIOsteopenia predictionX-ray images

Identifiers

PMID40343188
PMCPMC12059325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.