Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343185›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

The safety and feasibility of a pilot randomized clinical trial using combined exercise and neurostimulation for post-stroke pain: the EXERT-Stroke study.

Chen Lin, Charity J Morgan, E Lane Schlitz Fortenberry, X Michelle Androulakis, Keith McGregor

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04672044 (Feasibility of Combination Exercise and Neuromodulation Rehabilitation to Improve Post-stroke Chronic Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04672044 phase1completednot on this map

Feasibility of Combination Exercise and Neuromodulation Rehabilitation to Improve Post-stroke Chronic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2022 to 2024Enrolled9ConditionsChronic Post-stroke HeadacheArmsActive rTMS and exercise, Sham rTMS+Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen LinBirmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Charity J MorganDepartments of Biostatistics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
E Lane Schlitz FortenberryBirmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, United States.
X Michelle AndroulakisCharleston VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States.
Keith McGregorBirmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Funding

CSRD VA IK2 CX002104RRD VA I21 RX003612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain after stroke can occur between 10 and 50% of stroke survivors. Post-stroke pain (PSP) can lead to further complications in a stroke survivor's recovery. PSP is caused by the stroke itself and produces moderate or severe pain. It can manifest as new onset or worsening of prior headaches. Methods: EXERT-Stroke was a feasibility pilot 2-arm randomized sham-controlled, double-blind trial at a single center over a 30-day intervention period, followed by a month follow-up. Patients were recruited for this study from July 2022 through June 2024 at the Veterans Hospital. The study protocol was approved by the local institutional review board. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04672044). All potential participants were screened for safety with a graded exercise stress test before randomization. Participants were randomized (1:1) to either active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or sham rTMS. Both arms received the same exercise protocol. The intervention protocol consisted of 10 sessions over a 30-day period of rTMS (sham vs. active) + exercise, where rTMS was delivered prior to each exercise session on the same day. RTMS was aimed at the M1 of the contra-lesional hemisphere. Exercise was delivered on a recumbent bicycle targeting a participant's heart rate reserve. Primary outcomes were intervention feasibility (attendance and tolerance) and safety (adverse events). Results: Of those consented, one participant was a screen failure, and nine participants were randomized. The average age was 62 years old, 22.2% were female, and 44.4% were Black. For feasibility, five (55.5%) participants were randomized to active rTMS and four (44.4%) were randomized to sham rTMS. Four of the five (80%) active rTMS and two of the four (50.0%) of the sham rTMS completed the final assessment, suggesting that there was no association between treatment assignment and likelihood of completing the study. Importantly, there were no serious adverse events. Conclusion: This is the first feasibility trial to investigate paired intervention of exercise and rTMS in patients with post-stroke pain. The trial found that the intervention had few safety issues. There was overall positive feedback from participants. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04672044.

Indexed as

clinical trialexerciseexercise strokeneuromodulationneurostimulationpost-stroke headachespost-stroke painstroke

Identifiers

PMID40343185
PMCPMC12060257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.