Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343146›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025

Examining maternal and fetal outcomes across various subtypes of hypertension during pregnancy.

Laith Alhuneafat, Fares Ghanem, Sneha Nandy, Sana Khan, Anushree Puttur, Ahmad Jabri, Alaq Haddad, Bhavadharini Ramu, Bethany Sabol, Jessica Schultz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Obstetric Pharmacoethics: An ethical framework for obstetric pharmacology.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Response to letter regarding maternal and fetal outcomes across hypertensive pregnancy subtypes.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Article
  8. Comment on examining maternal and fetal outcomes across various subtypes of hypertension during pregnancy.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laith AlhuneafatDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Fares GhanemDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, USA.
Sneha NandyDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sana KhanDepartment of Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anushree PutturDepartment of Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ahmad JabriDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Alaq HaddadSchool of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Bhavadharini RamuDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bethany SabolDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jessica SchultzDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Selma CarlsonDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

CSRD VA IK2 CX002525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. It includes chronic hypertension (CH), gestational hypertension (GH), preeclampsia (PRE), and CH with superimposed preeclampsia (SPE).We aim to assess in-hospital maternal and fetal outcomes of women in each of these groups in comparison to normotensive controls. Methods: Study sample included women in the National Inpatient Sample dataset from 2016 to 2020 who were categorized into the 4 groups of HDP as described above. They were compared to normotensive pregnancies for maternal and fetal outcomes using regression analysis after adjusting for age, race, C-section status, and comorbidities. Results: The study dataset from October 2015-December 2020 included 19,089,780 delivery admissions with 2,771,809 (14.5 %) of patients affected by HDP. The HDP groups were distributed as follows: GH - 38 %, PRE - 32 %, SPE - 11 %, and CH - 19 %. Women with PRE, SPE, and CH had significantly higher rates of mortality, circulatory shock, peripartum cardiomyopathy, acute kidney injury, preterm labor, stillbirth, and cerebrovascular events as compared to normotensive patients, while GH did not. Specifically, maternal mortality was highest in the SPE group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.16), followed by PRE (aOR 2.91) and CH (aOR 2.42). Additionally, all HDP groups had higher rates of small for gestational age and significant bleeding as compared to normotensive patients. Conclusions: Pregnant patients with CH, PRE, and SPE experience higher rates of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes during their delivery admission when compared to normotensive patients. Understanding the graded risk differences across HDP subtypes may enable more tailored interventions, optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes for those at highest risk.

Indexed as

Chronic hypertensionFetalMaternalOutcomesPreeclampsiaSuperimposed

Identifiers

PMID40343146
PMCPMC12059398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.