ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025
Examining maternal and fetal outcomes across various subtypes of hypertension during pregnancy.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Obstetric Pharmacoethics: An ethical framework for obstetric pharmacology.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2026Article
- Late-pregnancy air pollution exposure and neonatal anthropometry with and without gestational hypertension.iScience · 2026Article
- Association of Substance Use and Psychological Conditions With Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Maternal Mortality and Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Risk Factors Across High-Income Countries.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Experiences of discrimination, paternal support, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in the MIEHR study, Houston, Texas.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Five-year cardiovascular outcomes across hypertensive disorders of pregnancy subtypes: a propensity-matched analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Response to letter regarding maternal and fetal outcomes across hypertensive pregnancy subtypes.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Comment on examining maternal and fetal outcomes across various subtypes of hypertension during pregnancy.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. It includes chronic hypertension (CH), gestational hypertension (GH), preeclampsia (PRE), and CH with superimposed preeclampsia (SPE).We aim to assess in-hospital maternal and fetal outcomes of women in each of these groups in comparison to normotensive controls. Methods: Study sample included women in the National Inpatient Sample dataset from 2016 to 2020 who were categorized into the 4 groups of HDP as described above. They were compared to normotensive pregnancies for maternal and fetal outcomes using regression analysis after adjusting for age, race, C-section status, and comorbidities. Results: The study dataset from October 2015-December 2020 included 19,089,780 delivery admissions with 2,771,809 (14.5 %) of patients affected by HDP. The HDP groups were distributed as follows: GH - 38 %, PRE - 32 %, SPE - 11 %, and CH - 19 %. Women with PRE, SPE, and CH had significantly higher rates of mortality, circulatory shock, peripartum cardiomyopathy, acute kidney injury, preterm labor, stillbirth, and cerebrovascular events as compared to normotensive patients, while GH did not. Specifically, maternal mortality was highest in the SPE group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.16), followed by PRE (aOR 2.91) and CH (aOR 2.42). Additionally, all HDP groups had higher rates of small for gestational age and significant bleeding as compared to normotensive patients. Conclusions: Pregnant patients with CH, PRE, and SPE experience higher rates of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes during their delivery admission when compared to normotensive patients. Understanding the graded risk differences across HDP subtypes may enable more tailored interventions, optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes for those at highest risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.