ReviewAustralian prescriber2025
Noninvasive prenatal testing: an overview.
Review in Australian prescriber, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quality of Evidence for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening: An Umbrella Review.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Pooled it
- Maternal Malignancies Identified Through Non-invasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells in Birth Defects: Integrated Roles in Disease Modeling, Prenatal Diagnosis, and Therapy.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Evaluation of short video quality and reliability of non-invasive prenatal testing on TikTok and Bilibili platforms: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Australian health authorities recommend offering prenatal screening for fetal chromosome conditions, also known as aneuploidies (e.g. Down syndrome [trisomy 21]), to all pregnant individuals to support informed decision-making. Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is one of 3 types of prenatal aneuploidy screening tests available in Australia. NIPT requires a maternal blood test after 10 weeks gestation. Although it doesn't require an ultrasound, a 12- or 13-week ultrasound is recommended as it provides an opportunity for early diagnosis of major structural anomalies. NIPT is not subsidised by Medicare. It is important to take a patient-centred approach when discussing screening options. Patients should be encouraged to consider whether knowing the test result will impact their pregnancy decision-making or preparations. There are two main NIPT approaches: genome-wide and targeted. All currently available NIPT platforms perform well for detecting the common autosomal aneuploidies (trisomy 21, 18 and 13). NIPT has the highest true-positive rate (highest sensitivity) and lowest false-positive rate (highest specificity) among aneuploidy screening methods, however false-positive results can occur. Genetic counselling and confirmatory invasive diagnostic testing are recommended for patients with a high-probability NIPT result, especially if they are considering pregnancy termination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.