Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343130›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Variation at the major facilitator superfamily

Girma Fana Dinsa, Joanne Russell, Brian Steffenson, Claire Halpin, Robbie Waugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Girma Fana DinsaUniversity of Dundee, Division of Plant Sciences at the James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Joanne RussellThe James Hutton Institute, Cell and Molecular Science Department, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Brian SteffensonDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Claire HalpinUniversity of Dundee, Division of Plant Sciences at the James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Robbie WaughUniversity of Dundee, Division of Plant Sciences at the James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food and nutritional security are global challenges exacerbated by an increasing human population and impacted by climate change. Barley is among the top cereal crops grown worldwide and is a strategic crop for food and nutrition security in several geographical domains. However, barley grains are generally limited in iron and zinc, two major micronutrient deficiencies affecting billions of people around the world, but particularly women and children in developing countries. One promising strategy to enhance crop micronutrient status is via biofortification, the identification and use of nutrient-rich natural variants in crop genetic improvement. Germplasm assessed as being rich in essential nutrients are used as parental materials in traditional breeding strategies. While simple in theory, directly assessing grain nutrient concentration as a phenotype in a crop breeding program is not trivial, particularly in lesser developed geographies. As an alternative, genetic diagnostics can simplify the identification of desirable progenies and accelerate the breeding process. Here we explored natural variation for grain zinc concentration within 296 Ethiopian and Eritrean barley landraces using a genome-wide association study. We found strong associations with two SNPs, both of which were located within the barley ortholog of a tonoplast-associated major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter gene, Zinc induced facilitator-like 1 (ZIFL1) of

Indexed as

barleygenome-wide association studymicronutrientquantitative trait locizinc

Identifiers

PMID40343130
PMCPMC12058730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.