ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Contrasting allocation patterns in wheat and weeds: allometric belowground and reproductive investment versus optimal partitioning adaptations.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global patterns of CThe New phytologist · 2026Article
- Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Imposes a Net Carbon Cost on Maize Under Phosphorus-Sufficient Conditions and Alters Nutrient-Dependent Scaling Trajectories.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Long-Term Nitrogen Fertilization Increases Soil Organic Carbon and Wheat Yields on Purple Soil in China.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Modeling differences in biomass allocation between wheat and weeds-specifically to shoots (aboveground biomass), roots (belowground biomass), and seed mass (reproductive biomass)-enhances our understanding of sustainable weeds management. However, few studies have examined how fertilization and planting density influence biomass accumulation and allocation at both vegetative and reproductive stages within a wheat-weed community. Methods: To address this gap, we conducted a greenhouse experiment growing wheat ( Results and Discussion: We found that the biomass of wheat and weeds increased with fertilization but decreased with higher planting density, with no interactions between these factors. Wheat allocated more biomass to roots than shoots and more to reproductive than vegetative biomass, regardless of fertilization or planting density, following allometric allocation theory. In contrast, weeds distributed biomass similarly between shoots and roots at planting densities of 4 and 12 under fertilization or allocated more biomass to roots than to shoots at these densities. Additionally, some weeds achieved higher yields at both small and large sizes under planting densities of 12 and 16, respectively, suggesting greater phenotypic plasticity. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of biomass allocation differences between wheat and weeds throughout their life cycles, offering insights into plant adaptation strategies and practical applications for optimizing agricultural management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.