ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Validation of a gender-specific binary depression screening version (GIDS-15) in two German samples.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Further Validation Study of the Gender-Specific Binary Depression Screening Version (GIDS-15) and Investigation of Intervention Effects.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Findings from depression research increasingly suggest a gender-dependent clinical appearance of relevant symptoms. At the same time, there is a lack of gender-sensitive screening procedures in clinical practice to better identify hidden depression in men. The present study examines the factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the translated version of the Gender Inclusive Depression Scale (GIDS) based on two large German-speaking mixed-sex samples, and assess sex and age effects. Methods: The preliminary exploratory validation of the German GIDS version was initially carried out using exploratory factor analysis with an online recruited non-clinical sample ( Results: The exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 5-factor solution, and was confirmed in the second analysis. A screening version comprises 15 items. Overall, psychometric properties are satisfactory, with only two subscales (aggressiveness, substance use) with critical values. The majority of sex effects could be established. Conclusions: The GIDS-15 is a solid, multidimensional depression screening instrument that should be complemented by a gender assessment tool. There is further evidence that the inclusion of additional criteria alters the gender ratio in depression screening. After further studies to validate the GIDS-15, implementation in primary care could be indicated. Gender beyond the binary should be analysed in further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.