ArticleDigital health
Concept of digital health literacy revisited: Using text network and topic model analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating digital health literacy interventions for adults 45+ years: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- TextRank-based healthcare big data analysis system for text network analysis and trend phase identification.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapid integration of ICT into healthcare has elevated the critical role of digital health literacy (DHL). However, the conceptual relationship between DHL and electronic health (eHealth), along with the impact of transformative events such as the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the COVID-19 pandemic, remains inadequately investigated. Objective: This study seeks to analyze research trends in DHL across four distinct historical periods to uncover key themes and their temporal evolution. Methods: A comparative analysis of 2645 abstracts from Scopus publications (1977-2022) was conducted, segmented into four periods: (I) emerging era (1977-2006), (II) establishment era (2007-2016), (III) diffusion era (2017-2020), and (IV) post-pandemic era (2021-present). Text network analysis identified core keywords, and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) extracted dominant topics and their temporal evolution. Results: Since 2006, DHL research has exhibited consistent growth, underpinned by transformative advancements during the Fourth Industrial Revolution and further amplified by a significant surge in scholarly engagement in the post-pandemic era. Importantly, during the diffusion era (Period III), a divergence in the trajectories of "digital health literacy" and "electronic health literacy" emerged.Text network analysis revealed a progression toward greater uniformity in node sizes over time, coupled with an increase in the complexity and intricacy of connections between nodes. These findings indicate a growing diversity and nuanced understanding of concepts associated with DHL. Moreover, research in the post-pandemic era (Period IV) emphasized the critical role of DHL in addressing health disparities and advancing equitable access to healthcare. Conclusion: The study reveals the dynamic progression of DHL research, catalyzed by technological advancements and global health crises. Strengthening DHL, particularly among vulnerable populations, is crucial for mitigating health disparities in a rapidly digitalizing world. Future research should prioritize the development of targeted interventions and examine DHL's impact across diverse sociocultural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.