Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343063›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Enhancing medical AI with retrieval-augmented generation: A mini narrative review.

Omid Kohandel Gargari, Gholamreza Habibi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnostic accuracy and citation integrity of four large language models on otolaryngology vignettes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omid Kohandel GargariFarzan Artificial Intelligence Team, Farzan Clinical Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8182-0582
Gholamreza HabibiFarzan Artificial Intelligence Team, Farzan Clinical Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1693-9142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a powerful technique in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by integrating external data sources, allowing for more accurate, contextually relevant responses. In medical applications, RAG has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, clinical decision support, and patient care. This narrative review explores the application of RAG across various medical domains, including guideline interpretation, diagnostic assistance, clinical trial eligibility screening, clinical information retrieval, and information extraction from scientific literature. Studies highlight the benefits of RAG in providing accurate, up-to-date information, improving clinical outcomes, and streamlining processes. Notable applications include GPT-4 models enhanced with RAG to interpret hepatologic guidelines, assist in differential diagnosis, and aid in clinical trial screening. Furthermore, RAG-based systems have demonstrated superior performance over traditional methods in tasks such as patient diagnosis, clinical decision-making, and medical information extraction. Despite its advantages, challenges remain, particularly in model evaluation, cost-efficiency, and reducing AI hallucinations. This review emphasizes the potential of RAG in advancing medical AI applications and advocates for further optimization of retrieval mechanisms, embedding models, and collaboration between AI researchers and healthcare professionals to maximize RAG's impact on medical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical decision supportclinical trial eligibility screeningdiagnostic assistanceguideline interpretationlarge language models (LLMs)medical applicationsRetrieval-augmented generation (RAG)

Identifiers

PMID40343063
PMCPMC12059965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.