Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343054›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Morphometric analysis of the abducens nerve in the petroclival region.

M Bach, M J Schmeisser, S Schumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M BachInstitute of Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
M J SchmeisserInstitute of Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
S SchumannInstitute of Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The abducens nerve (AN), our sixth cranial nerve, is responsible for the innervation of the lateral rectus muscle of the eye. The abducens nerve is a vulnerable structure at the skull base with its long intracranial course and complex topographic relationships. The AN anatomy in the petroclival region, where the nerve passes from the posterior to the middle cranial fossa, is of great interest for neurosurgical procedures. Despite detailed studies of its anatomy from the past 150 years, there is a need for more recent data on macroscopical and microscopical aspects of the AN in well defined populations. Methods: We investigated macroscopical variations and the number of nerve fibers of the AN in the petroclival region in German body donors. Results: In our histological samples ( Conclusion: Variations of the AN in the petroclival region are not a rare phenomenon but occur very frequently. Consequently, we have developed a new classification system for AN variations. This knowledge might help neurosurgeons, as it prepares them to be aware of such variations and adapt their surgical approaches accordingly.

Indexed as

anatomical variationcranial nervedura materneurosurgeryskull base

Identifiers

PMID40343054
PMCPMC12058666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.