ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Risk factors associated with secondary displacement in fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plate fixation combined with suture bridge technique for proximal humeral fracture-dislocation with displaced greater tuberosity: a case series.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Distal radius T-shaped locking plate with suture anchors for humeral greater tuberosity fracture with rotator cuff injury: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2026Article
- Osteosynthesis with a muscle advancement for a severely retracted greater tuberosity avulsion fracture: a case report.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of secondary displacement in fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus remains high, irrespective of whether conservative or surgical treatment is administered. However, the specific risk factors contributing to secondary displacement of the greater tuberosity of the humerus have not been previously reported. The primary objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors associated with secondary displacement of the greater tuberosity of the humerus and to summarize corresponding guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus who received treatment at the same trauma center between January 2018 and December 2022. The following variables were recorded for each patient: age, gender, injured limb (left/right), whether the fracture was comminuted, bone density, fracture displacement, shoulder joint dislocation, treatment plan, and treatment outcomes, including the success rate of reduction and the time of secondary displacement. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the absence or presence of secondary displacement. For statistical analysis, the Mann-Whitney Results: Among the 177 patients enrolled in this study, 144 (81.36%) did not exhibit secondary displacement, while 33 (18.64%) did present with such displacement. Significant statistical differences were observed between the two groups in mean age, fracture type, bone mineral density, shoulder dislocation, and reduction quality of fracture, indicating a statistically significant association ( Conclusions: Comminuted fracture, osteoporosis, shoulder dislocation, and poor reduction have been identified as independent risk factors for secondary displacement. In the course of clinical diagnosis and treatment, it is imperative to consider the potential adverse prognosis that may be associated with these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.