ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Results: In 12 months of production (within a single Amazon Web Services (AWS) Region), around 200 million serverless functions and over 20 million messages coordinated the analysis of 1.8 million bioinformatics, quality control, and clinical reporting jobs. Adapting WGS analysis to clinical projects requires adaptation of variant-calling methods to enrich the reliable detection of variants with known clinical importance. Thus, we also share the process by which we tuned the variant-calling pipeline in use by the multiple genome centers supporting Conclusions: When combined with hardware-accelerated implementations for genomic analysis, Celeste had far-reaching, positive implications for turn-around time, dynamic scalability, security, and storage of analysis for one hundred-thousand whole-genome samples and counting. Other groups may align their sequencing workflows to this harmonized pipeline standard, included within the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.