Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343036›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Assessment of the Modified Rankin Scale in Electronic Health Records with a Fine-tuned Large Language Model.

Luis Silva, Marcus Milani, Sohum Bindra, Salman Ikramuddin, Megan Tessmer, Kaylee Frederickson, Abhigyan Datta, Halil Ergen, Alex Stangebye, Dawson Cooper and 4 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Luis SilvaDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5405-0589
Marcus MilaniDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Sohum BindraDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Salman IkramuddinDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Megan TessmerDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Kaylee FredericksonDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Abhigyan DattaDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Halil ErgenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-2642
Alex StangebyeAcute Rehabilitation Unit, M Health Fairview, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Dawson CooperDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Kompal KumarDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Jeremy YeungDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Kamakshi LakshminarayanDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8564-8986
Christopher D StreibDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1119-757X

Funding

mGlide-Care: A mHealth Partnership with Care Givers to Improve HTN Management in Patients with Cognitive ImpairmentK24AG078506 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KAMAKSHI LAKSHMINARAYAN · 2023 to 2026
$688k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG078506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The modified Rankin scale (mRS) is an important metric in stroke research, often used as a primary outcome in clinical trials and observational studies. The mRS can be assessed retrospectively from electronic health records (EHR), though this process is labor-intensive and prone to inter-rater variability. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in automating clinical text classification. We hypothesize that a fine-tuned LLM can analyze EHR text and classify mRS scores for clinical and research applications. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a specialist stroke neurology service at a large academic hospital system between August 2020 and June 2023. Each patient's medical record was reviewed at two time points: (1) hospital discharge and (2) approximately 90 days post-discharge. Two independent researchers assigned an mRS score at each time point. Two separate models were trained on EHR passages with corresponding mRS scores as labeled outcomes: (1) a multiclass model to classify all seven mRS scores and (2) a binary model to classify functional independence (mRS 0-2) versus non-independence (mRS 3-6). Four-fold cross-validation was conducted, using accuracy and Cohen's kappa as model performance metrics. Results: A total of 2,290 EHR passages with corresponding mRS scores were included in model training. The multiclass model-considering all seven scores of the mRS-attained an accuracy of 77% and a weighted Cohen's Kappa of 0.92. Class-specific accuracy was highest for mRS 4 (90%) and lowest for mRS 2 (28%). The binary model-considering only functional independence vs non-independence -attained an accuracy of 92% and Cohen's Kappa of 0.84. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that LLMs can be successfully trained to determine mRS scores through EHR text analysis. With further advancements, fully automated LLMs could scale across large clinical datasets, enabling data-driven public health strategies and optimized resource allocation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine Learningmodified Rankin ScaleStroke

Identifiers

PMID40343036
PMCPMC12060943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.