ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Predicting Organ Rejections for Pediatric Heart Transplantations with a Combined Use of Transplant Registry Data and Electronic Health Records.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Pediatric heart transplantation is challenged by limited donor organ availability, prolonged waitlist times, and elevated risks of late acute rejection (LAR) and hospitalization. Current predictive models for post-transplant outcomes lack high accuracy due to reliance on registry data without integrating dynamic clinical and social factors. This study aimed to improve predictive performance and model interpretability by incorporating electronic health records (EHR), social determinants of health (SDoH), and United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data. Materials and Methods: We used EHR and UNOS data from 111 pediatric heart transplant patients (ages 0-18) at the University of Florida Health Shands Children's Hospital to build predictive models for organ rejection at 1-, 3-, and 5-year intervals post-transplant. UNOS data includes pre- and post-transplant health and medical records, encompassing procedures, clinical evaluations, and post-transplant follow-up information, EHR data included evolving clinical parameters (e.g., comorbidities, medication adherence, and laboratory results), while SDoH encompassed socioeconomic status, living conditions, and healthcare access. Feature importance was assessed using Shapley Variable Importance Cloud (ShapleyVIC), which integrates Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to provide robust, interpretable insights across nearly optimal models. Results: Models integrating EHR, SDoH, and UNOS data outperformed those using UNOS data alone, with AUROC of 0.743 (0.607-0.879), 0.798 (0.725-0.871), and 0.760 (0.692-0.828). Key predictors of rejection included severe pre-transplant conditions (e.g., life support, prolonged waitlist times), elevated bilirubin and creatinine levels, and social factors (e.g., transportation barriers, BMI, insurance type). Discussion: Findings reveal the importance of integrating clinical and social data to address multisystem dysfunction, disparities in healthcare access, and adherence challenges. ShapleyVIC enhanced model interpretability, providing actionable insights for improving post-transplant care. Conclusion: Holistic, data-driven approaches that combine EHR, SDoH, and registry data significantly enhance predictive accuracy and interpretability, supporting improved long-term outcomes for pediatric heart transplant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.