ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Detection of patient metadata in published articles for genomic epidemiology using machine learning and large language models.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enriching Public Pathogen Genomic Records With Patient Metadata: Quantitative Study and Exploratory Case Analysis.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Patient metadata exist in published articles, but are often disconnected from genome sequences in databases, limiting their utility for genomic epidemiology. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate natural language processing methods to facilitate the large-scale detection of patient metadata associated with reports of genome sequencing in published articles, drawing on the case of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We applied filters to select a sample of 245 PubMed articles (50,918 sentences) in LitCovid for manual annotation of sentences that reported generating SARS-CoV-2 sequences. We trained, deployed, and validated a BERT-based classifier, and selected a sample of 150 predicted articles (22,147 sentences) for manual annotation of sentences that reported patient metadata associated with the sequences. In addition to training BERT-based classifiers, we experimented with a generative AI approach, prompting the Llama-3-70B LLM using zero-shot, role-based, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and reasoning-eliciting prompting. Results: BERT-based models that were pre-trained on corpora in biomedical or, more specifically, COVID-19 domains outperformed those that were pre-trained on corpora in general domains for detecting reports of patient metadata associated with SARS-CoV-2 sequences, achieving the best performance with a classifier based on a BiomedBERT-Large-Abstract model (F Conclusion: Our methods were applied to more than 350,000 published articles and can be used to advance the utility and efficiency of genomic epidemiology for public health responses to virus outbreaks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.