Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342956›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025

Application of Metagenomic and Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.

Zhen Yang, Qian Liu, Yi Hu, Shuang Geng, Ji-Xiang Ni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhen Yang *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Qian Liu *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Yi HuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Shuang GengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Ji-Xiang NiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the application value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Patients and Methods: Data from 202 patients with suspected PTB at Wuhan Central Hospital (Jan 2022 - Jan 2024) were retrospectively analyzed. BALF samples were collected and examined using mNGS and tNGS, comparing their sensitivity to traditional methods like acid-fast staining, TB culture, and TB-DNA. Mixed microbial species were identified from the BALF using mNGS and tNGS, and the pros and cons of tNGS were evaluated against mNGS. Results: Of the 202 patients evaluated, 94 were diagnosed with PTB. The BALF mNGS and tNGS exhibited a sensitivity of 77.66% and a specificity of 100%, with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 83.72%, respectively, outperforming conventional diagnostic methods. It was possible to compare the AUC values of the ROC curves of the BALF mNGS and tNGS with the corresponding values of the other three assay methods (0.89 vs 0.56, p < 0.05), MTB culture (0.89 vs 0.71, p < 0.05), and TB-DNA (0.89 vs 0.68, p < 0.05). Additionally, these techniques identified mixed microbial species in 52.13% of the BALF samples. Although both mNGS and tNGS demonstrated similar diagnostic rates, tNGS proved to be faster, more cost-effective, and incorporated a tuberculosis-specific wall-breaking technology, thereby suggesting greater clinical utility. Conclusion: BALF mNGS and tNGS technologies quickly and accurately detect PTB patients with greater sensitivity and specificity than traditional MTB methods. While both mNGS and tNGS demonstrate enhanced capacity for polymicrobial detection, the clinical significance of co-detected microorganisms requires integration with clinical context to differentiate colonization from active infection. Compared to mNGS, tNGS provides distinct advantages in clinical utility.

Indexed as

bronchoalveolar lavage fluiddiagnosismetagenomic next-generation sequencingpulmonary tuberculosistargeted next-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40342956
PMCPMC12059218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.