ArticleBioelectricity2025
Pulse Lavage and Electrical Fields to Remove Biofilms from Cobalt-Chrome Surfaces: An
Article in Bioelectricity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrolytic cleaning as a biofilm control strategy on medical implants: mechanisms, evidence and translational perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Adjunctive intraoperative pulsed direct current with cefazolin: a rabbit proof-of-concept model for prevention of prosthetic joint infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the increased use of metallic devices in medical disciplines, the number of potential complications has also risen. Orthopedic implant-related infections are a serious complication often requiring a combination of surgical and prolonged antibiotic treatment. Biofilms play an important role in implant-related infections, and many different strategies have been studied to remove it. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of electrical fields and pulse lavage to remove Methods: We compared five different models and combination treatments in an Results: The most effective model for removing biofilm from cobalt-chrome surfaces was a combination of high-pressure pulse lavage and electrical fields. Conclusion: Our study results suggest the use of pulsed electrical fields is effective at removing biofilm and that our tested conditions could be translated to a clinical scenario involving infected medical devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.