ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025
Impaired cell viability and mitochondrial respiration by disperse textile dyes.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune and epithelial responses to textile dyes: the role of chemical structure in toxicity.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the use of synthetic textile dyes has increased. The effects of these chemicals or their metabolites on our skin and our immune system have not been well studied. However, skin irritants have been reported to break the dermal barrier to start a chain of reactions that dysregulate the immune system. In the last decades, the incidence of atopic diseases and cancer has been increasing. There is an urgent need to identify the environmental triggers that fuel these conditions. This study aimed to investigate the effects of some of the common disperse textile dyes on the viability, and mitochondrial function of cultures of mouse keratinocytes (MPEK-BL6 line) and intestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC-J2 cells). The cells were cultured with Disperse (D) dyes Red 11, Orange 37, Blue 1, Blue 124, Blue 291, Blue 79.1, and Brown 1 as well as Quinone and Tartrazine, and PPD as control. At concentrations representative of human exposure from 30 min to 3 days. Cell viability, Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) and Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR) were quantified. Disperse Blue 1, Blue 124, and Brown 1 impaired cell viability and mitochondrial function as early as 3 h after exposure with IPEC-J2 and MPEK-BL6 cells. However, D. Blue 79.1 and Blue 291 did not have those effects. These data suggest that common disperse textile dyes can influence cell viability and mitochondrial function. This effect could be related to their chemical structure and physicochemical properties, such as size and polarity giving them differences in membrane permeability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.