Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342924›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025

Impaired cell viability and mitochondrial respiration by disperse textile dyes.

Lizette M Cortes, Nelson R Vinueza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lizette M CortesDepartment of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Nelson R VinuezaDepartment of Textile Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the use of synthetic textile dyes has increased. The effects of these chemicals or their metabolites on our skin and our immune system have not been well studied. However, skin irritants have been reported to break the dermal barrier to start a chain of reactions that dysregulate the immune system. In the last decades, the incidence of atopic diseases and cancer has been increasing. There is an urgent need to identify the environmental triggers that fuel these conditions. This study aimed to investigate the effects of some of the common disperse textile dyes on the viability, and mitochondrial function of cultures of mouse keratinocytes (MPEK-BL6 line) and intestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC-J2 cells). The cells were cultured with Disperse (D) dyes Red 11, Orange 37, Blue 1, Blue 124, Blue 291, Blue 79.1, and Brown 1 as well as Quinone and Tartrazine, and PPD as control. At concentrations representative of human exposure from 30 min to 3 days. Cell viability, Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) and Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR) were quantified. Disperse Blue 1, Blue 124, and Brown 1 impaired cell viability and mitochondrial function as early as 3 h after exposure with IPEC-J2 and MPEK-BL6 cells. However, D. Blue 79.1 and Blue 291 did not have those effects. These data suggest that common disperse textile dyes can influence cell viability and mitochondrial function. This effect could be related to their chemical structure and physicochemical properties, such as size and polarity giving them differences in membrane permeability.

Indexed as

cell viabilityD. Blue 1D. Blue 124D. Brown 1disperse dyesmitochondrial respirationtextile dyes

Identifiers

PMID40342924
PMCPMC12058755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.