Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342905›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Reference framework for metadata description to commensurate data in grain production.

Katariina Pussi, Petri Linna, Pasi Suomi, Kim Kaustell, Liisa Pesonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katariina PussiNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Production Systems, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Petri LinnaTampere University of Technology, Signal Processing Laboratory, Pori, Finland.
Pasi SuomiNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Production Systems, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Kim KaustellNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Production Systems, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Liisa PesonenNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Production Systems, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data spaces will bring the need to harmonize the farm collected data for better interoperability. Attention needs also to be paid to data accessibility, since the value of data is strongly linked to its use. The evolving data space technologies will bring service providers that help farmers to translate farm born datasets to data products that can have measurable value. Data products can then be published to the data space catalog, allowing other people to discover and consume them. Data used for data products, decision-making, reporting, or analysis should be reliable and trustworthy. Common metadata standards, catalogs and ontologies will help to achieve this goal. The scope of this paper is to discuss requirements for metadata in grain production.

Indexed as

AgricultureDataData spaceGrain productionMetadataSmart farming

Identifiers

PMID40342905
PMCPMC12060477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.