Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342845›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2025

National Cancer Grid initiative for electronic medical records, India.

C S Pramesh, Rizwan Koita, Manju Sengar, Nikesh Shah, Anthony Vipin Das, Prakash Nayak, Kiran Anandampillai, Prathamesh Pai, Amrut Kadam, Indranil Mallick and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Geographic access as a modifiable determinant of cancer care: perspectives on hub-and-spoke oncology networks, travel burden and time toxicity.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

C S PrameshTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Rizwan KoitaKoita Foundation, Koita Centre for Digital Oncology, Mumbai, India.
Manju SengarTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Nikesh ShahNational Cancer Grid, Koita Centre for Digital Oncology, Mumbai, India.
Anthony Vipin DasFernandez Hospital Education and Research Foundation, Hyderabad, India.
Prakash NayakTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Kiran AnandampillaiiDrishti Eye Hospitals, Bangalore, India.
Prathamesh PaiPunyashlok Ahilyadevi Holkar Head and Neck Cancer Institute of India, Mumbai, India.
Amrut KadamVictoria Hospital, Bangalore Medical College, Bangalore, India.
Indranil MallickTata Medical Center, Kolkata, India.
Prabhat BhargavaTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Prasanth PenumaduSri Venkateswara Institute of Cancer Care and Advanced Research, Tirupati, India.
Chandran K NairMalabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, India.
Bibhuti BorthakurB Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, India.
M AarishKoita Foundation, Koita Centre for Digital Oncology, Mumbai, India.
Geetu BagriNational Cancer Grid, Koita Centre for Digital Oncology, Mumbai, India.
Sarbani Ghosh-LaskarTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Anil TibdewalTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Latha BalasubramaniG Kuppuswamy Naidu Memorial Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Abhishek JainSwasth Alliance, Bangalore, India.
Aditya JandialHomi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Mullanpur, India.
Gagan PrakashTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Nilesh TeliKoita Foundation, Koita Centre for Digital Oncology, Mumbai, India.
Smita KayalJawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Surabhi GoelKoita Foundation, Koita Centre for Digital Oncology, Mumbai, India.
Krupa MayekarKoita Foundation, Koita Centre for Digital Oncology, Mumbai, India.
Priya RanganathanTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Vandana AgarwalTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Madhavi ShetmahajanTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Reshma AmbulkarTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Jayita DeodharTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Aparna ChatterjeeTata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, National Cancer Grid, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai400012, India.
Mukkesh BansalNational Cancer Grid, Koita Centre for Digital Oncology, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problem: Inefficient workflows, incomplete data and lack of interoperability can hinder the uptake of electronic records systems, challenges particularly relevant in cancer treatment with its complex longitudinal and multidisciplinary nature. Further, products developed in high-income countries are not designed for compatibility with the workflows of low- and middle-income countries, which face additional issues of cost. Approach: We evaluated centres with different resources and geographical locations to develop the requirements of our product. We published an invitation to potential vendors, evaluated submitted product development bids and enlisted six vendors. Our subcommittees developed workflow modules and templates, ensured interoperability and developed key performance indicators. Setting: The National Cancer Grid, a network of more than 360 cancer centres in India, assembled a team of experienced oncologists and digital health experts to develop electronic medical records products with specialized oncology capabilities. Relevant changes: Our collaboration between clinical and technical experts led to the development of six new, high-quality and interoperable products, compliant with the varying needs and resources of hospitals. We supported more than 20 centres with procurement and adoption through partial funding and technical assistance. Lessons learnt: In developing product requirements, we gained an understanding of the challenges faced by hospitals in implementing such systems; by inviting vendors to submit a product development bid, we ensured that the product development cost was borne by the vendor and not hospitals; and by monitoring user feedback, we can continue to address issues raised by health workers and encourage the adoption of electronic medical records.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesElectronic Health RecordsMedical OncologyNeoplasmsHumansIndiaWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID40342845
PMCPMC12057217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.