ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2025
National Cancer Grid initiative for electronic medical records, India.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geographic access as a modifiable determinant of cancer care: perspectives on hub-and-spoke oncology networks, travel burden and time toxicity.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Problem: Inefficient workflows, incomplete data and lack of interoperability can hinder the uptake of electronic records systems, challenges particularly relevant in cancer treatment with its complex longitudinal and multidisciplinary nature. Further, products developed in high-income countries are not designed for compatibility with the workflows of low- and middle-income countries, which face additional issues of cost. Approach: We evaluated centres with different resources and geographical locations to develop the requirements of our product. We published an invitation to potential vendors, evaluated submitted product development bids and enlisted six vendors. Our subcommittees developed workflow modules and templates, ensured interoperability and developed key performance indicators. Setting: The National Cancer Grid, a network of more than 360 cancer centres in India, assembled a team of experienced oncologists and digital health experts to develop electronic medical records products with specialized oncology capabilities. Relevant changes: Our collaboration between clinical and technical experts led to the development of six new, high-quality and interoperable products, compliant with the varying needs and resources of hospitals. We supported more than 20 centres with procurement and adoption through partial funding and technical assistance. Lessons learnt: In developing product requirements, we gained an understanding of the challenges faced by hospitals in implementing such systems; by inviting vendors to submit a product development bid, we ensured that the product development cost was borne by the vendor and not hospitals; and by monitoring user feedback, we can continue to address issues raised by health workers and encourage the adoption of electronic medical records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.