Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40342802›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sociology2025

Emotionally entwined narratives: a polyphonic trialogue on learning disability history research.

Owen Barden, Rhiannon Currie, Ian Davies, Helena Gunnarsdóttir, Jónína Hjartardóttir, Nathaniel Lawford, Jonathon Lyons, Sólveig Ólafsdóttir, Emily Oldnall, Sarah Oldnall and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Owen BardenTCPID, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Rhiannon CurrieTRAC, University of South Wales, Wales, United Kingdom.
Ian DaviesSHLD, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Helena GunnarsdóttirSchool of Education, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Jónína HjartardóttirSchool of Education, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Nathaniel LawfordSHLD, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Jonathon LyonsThe Brain Charity, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Sólveig ÓlafsdóttirSchool of Education, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Emily OldnallThe Brain Charity, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Sarah OldnallThe Brain Charity, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Guðrún Valgerður StefánsdóttirSchool of Education, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Amber TahirThe Brain Charity, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Samantha TaylorTRAC, University of South Wales, Wales, United Kingdom.
Liz TilleySHLD, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Katrín TryggvadóttirSchool of Education, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Steven J WaldenFaculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Treforest, United Kingdom.
Heather WattsThe Brain Charity, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Clare WrightThe Brain Charity, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Christine WrightThe Brain Charity, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper offers a critical analysis of the concept of "emotional community" in the context of our research into histories of learning disability. Emotional communities are places where people feel, express and make sense of emotions. They help us to understand that emotions are something we experience socially and not just individually. The paper is presented in the form of a conversation between many researchers. This is what we mean by "polyphonic," which translates as "many voices." Some of us have learning disabilities, and some of us do not. Although there are many voices, the authors belong to teams who worked on three learning disability history projects. Each team comprises researchers and self-advocates with learning disabilities and academics without. We use the word "trialogue" to mean discussion involving the three teams. In the discussion, we first talk about what we mean by "emotional community." Then we talk about the purpose of emotional communities, and their "light" (good) and "dark" (bad) aspects. We also talk about a process called "commoning," which is working to understand what we have in common. This leads into a discussion of the ethics of emotional communities. We conclude by reflecting on some of the possibilities and problems we see with emotional communities.

Indexed as

activismautobiographycritical disability studiesemotional communityemotionsinclusive researchlearning disability studiespolyphonic conversation

Identifiers

PMID40342802
PMCPMC12060435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.