ArticleInterventional pain medicine2025
Assessment of real-world, prospective outcomes in patients treated with lumbar radiofrequency ablation for chronic pain (RAPID).
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04673032 (Radiofrequency), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation Prospective Outcomes Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Cervical Nerves for Treating Cervicogenic Headache.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- A pilot morphometric analysis of lumbar vertebrae to identify fluoroscopic biomarkers.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoablation for Lumbar Facet Joint Degeneration: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with 24-Month Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evidence of Multifidus Changes Post-Lumbar Radiofrequency Ablation: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessment of real-world, prospective outcomes in patients treated with cervical radiofrequency ablation for chronic pain (RAPID).Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lumbar facet joint syndrome (LFJS) is one of most common forms of chronic low back pain. Despite several decades of real-world use and a plethora of published studies, debate still exists regarding the effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) as a therapy in LFJS-diagnosed patients. Objective: Here, we sought to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in RFA-treated patients with chronic lumbar facetogenic pain participating in one of the largest studies of its kind published to date. Methods: The RAPID study (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04673032) is an international, multicenter, prospective study of patients using a commercially-available radiofrequency ablation system for the treatment of chronic pain, provided per standard of care. Patients were assessed at pre-specified study follow-up visits (1-, 3-. 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-index procedure). Key clinical endpoint measures collected and evaluated include NRS (pain score), Oswestry Disability Index (functional disability, ODI), EQ-5D-5L (quality-of-life), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Results: To date, 193 patients have been enrolled in this lumbar facetogenic pain patient cohort. Evaluation of pain relief amongst patients assessed out to 24-months demonstrated a mean NRS score of 3.4 (baseline NRS: 6.6, p < 0.0001). Consistent functional improvement out to 24-months was observed per an 8.6-point mean ODI score reduction (baseline ODI: 38.0, p < 0.0001). Following RFA treatment at 1-month and out to 24-months, 77.0% and 79.0% of patients were observed to be treatment responders (i.e., ≥50% pain relief), respectively. Enhanced levels in measures of quality-of-life (EQ-5D-5L) and self-reported health-related change (PGIC) were also consistently noted. Conclusions: Clinically meaningful and durable improvements in pain relief, functional disability, quality-of-life and treatment satisfaction were observed across all RAPID study follow-up visits. The results of the RAPID study provide for the potential clinical outcomes amongst selected patients with lumbar facetogenic pain within the real-world clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.